Can you improve this? Zipping two lists, the result must be same size as the first list

Questions / Help
, ,
41

this one performs totally different, what is going on there?

42

Because I asked him if he can make an algorithm that doesnā€™t care which list is bigger. Maybe I shouldnā€™t have included it in the final list of others that are specialized for the case when the first list is bigger (although I havenā€™t inspected all of them in exhaustive detail to make sure of that).

I also removed the Enum.min_max_by from the start of each implementation so thatā€™s definitely giving different ā€“ and Iā€™d say more objective and in line with the original requirements ā€“ results.

43

But how come it performs so differently for the same given data in different envirnoments

44

No idea. :100:

I am super busy lately but since I promised Iā€™ll make a Git repo I just allocated 30 mins last evening and did it. You guys are free to experiment and post findings, Iā€™d be interested. :slight_smile:

Maybe you, too, can post your, a-hem, eksperimental findings. :003:

1 Like
45

Could please also include the file with the benchmarks, I am mostly interested in the data you used for testing.

46

From ZipLeft.bench function:

l0 = Enum.to_list(1..2000)
l1 = [:worker_0, :worker_1, :worker_2, :worker_3, :worker_4]
1 Like