An amazing reply, although quite confusing (to me). Not because you are not clear, but because the way I interpret it translates to: “the book goes against the idiom of the language it teaches”.
You can probably guess why I am confused, such a statement would be … problematic at best 
I just don’t understand why would the author deviate from the community guidelines. Maybe they didn’t exist back then? Or am I missing some edge case?
@LostKobrakai Thank you for confirmation ! I see now the way to go is to change the API of the underlying functions to be more idiomatic !
