bvobart
Hi Elixir forum!
I have a function component to view, edit and delete an object from my database. This component obviously contains a form to perform and submit the edits that the user makes, but it also contains a Delete button to delete it, see the screenshot below.
Shortened for brevity, this is the implementation of that component:
<div class="...">
<.form for={@form} phx-change="validate-changes" phx-submit="save-changes">
<%!-- form inputs here --%>
<footer class="flex justify-between items-center">
<div class="flex gap-2">
<.button
variant="secondary"
disabled={not changed?(@form)}
phx-disable-with="..."
>
Save
</.button>
<.button {[{@return_method, @return_to}]}>Cancel</.button>
</div>
<.button
variant="outline"
class="btn-md btn-error text-error hover:text-base-100"
phx-click="delete"
phx-value-id={@job_request.id}
data-confirm="Are you sure you want to delete this job request?"
>
<.icon name="hero-trash" class="size-5" />
</.button>
</footer>
</.form>
</div>
My problem is that whenever I click the Delete button, it not only triggers the delete event like I want it to, but it also triggers the form submission, thus causing the save-changes event to be fired as well. How do I prevent that from happening so that only the delete event gets fired?
What I’ve tried so far:
- Use
phx-clickwith“delete”. Does not work, as described. - Use
phx-clickwithJS.push(“delete”) |> JS.patch(@return_to). Does not work, same problem. - Tried putting the same props as what the Cancel button gets on the Delete button (effectively:
patch={@return_to}), along withphx-click="delete". Does not work, thedeleteevent is never triggered, only the patch is executed. - Moved the Delete button outside of the
.formcomponent, but then I couldn’t figure out how to neatly style the button to still be positioned in the same way the screenshot shows. - I read in the docs that
phx-changecan also be applied on individual elements rather than just the form, which would cause the form’s change event to be ignored and only the individual element’s change event to be fired. I thought maybe the same applies tophx-submit, but it does not: puttingphx-submit=”delete”or something similar on the Delete button has no effect and the problem still persists.
Do you have any ideas for a good solution?
important to note:
- the
.buttoncomponent was generated by Phoenix 1.8.1 when I created the project, I merely extended the variants and made it possible to extend the classes passed down into it.- the Cancel button works just fine and doesn’t trigger a form re-submission, because the generated
.buttoncomponent renders as a.linkwhen given an href, navigate or patch prop.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
The Everything App - Lars Wikman | ElixirConf EU 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsB0CroGHsk
Comments welcome! View the <span cla...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security











Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
garrison
bvobart
Thanks,
AI already gave me this answer but because
type=buttoncombined withphx-click={JS.push(“delete”) |> JS.patch(@return_to)}solves it! Now I feel stupid for not trying that earliertypeisn’t in theincludelist forattr :reston the default generated button component, I thought it was just a bogus response.For those who were just like me looking for an explanation as to why this works and is valid, see the MDN docs: <button> HTML button element - HTML | MDN
garrison
Huh, you’re right. The docs explicitly state that the list of HTML global attributes is used but type is in there despite not being a global attribute.
That line in the docs should probably be updated!
garrison
Apparently someone just popped by and added it one day, probably unaware that it was “supposed” to be a list of global attributes! TBH I don’t think the idea of the list being global-only is helpful anyway, there are a number of common attributes that I hate having to put in
:includeevery time.