When a function doesn’t match, for example:
|> Multi.update(:add_something, fn %{required: obj} ->
...
end)
If this is called when required is not in the multi (but can be anything like, Enum.map([1, 2, 3], fn {} -> 0 end)) I get an error like this:
** (FunctionClauseError) no function clause matching in anonymous fn/1 in Book.CMS.Queries.multi_ensure_list/4
The following arguments were given to anonymous fn/1 in Book.CMS.Queries.multi_ensure_list/4:
# 1
... ctx
code: CMS.update_page_children(site.id, page_r.gid, [
stacktrace:
(book 0.1.0) anonymous fn/1 in Book.CMS.Queries.multi_ensure_list/4
(ecto 3.11.2) lib/ecto/multi.ex:973: anonymous fn/5 in Ecto.Multi.operation_fun/2
(ecto 3.11.2) lib/ecto/multi.ex:883: Ecto.Multi.apply_operation/5
(elixir 1.17.2) lib/enum.ex:2531: Enum."-reduce/3-lists^foldl/2-0-"/3
(ecto 3.11.2) lib/ecto/multi.ex:856: anonymous fn/5 in Ecto.Multi.apply_operations/5
(ecto_sql 3.11.2) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:1358: anonymous fn/3 in Ecto.Adapters.SQL.checkout_or_transaction/4
(db_connection 2.6.0) lib/db_connection.ex:1710: DBConnection.run_transaction/4
(ecto 3.11.2) lib/ecto/repo/transaction.ex:18: Ecto.Repo.Transaction.transaction/4
(book 0.1.0) lib/ecto/helpers.ex:56: Book.Ecto.Helpers.transaction/2
test/book/cms_test.exs:98: (test)
My problem is with this line:
(book 0.1.0) anonymous fn/1 in Book.CMS.Queries.multi_ensure_list/4
Because it is an anonymous function, there is no line number. Only thing I know is that the error was in multi_ensure_list which has like 4-5 anonymous functions like this. So it makes it hard to pinpoint.
Is there a way to improve this (only required for debugging, so I don’t care about a performance hit)?
Line number would be a start. But something like this would even be better:
95: |> Multi.update(:add_something, fn %{required: obj} ->
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ arguments didn't match definition
