acrolink
Hi,
Table A:
Dishes: id and name fields.
Table B:
Users: with a field called favorite_dishes holding an array of id’s (of dishes).
Is there an Ecto way to treat this as an association ? e.g. for pre-loading ?
How to best do that. I am using PostgreSQL.
Thank you
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security










Showing Posts 1 to 7- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
benwilson512
In general it is better to use a join table instead of an array of integers. This ensures you can use foreign key references, and will index better. There is no built in support for driving associations via an array of integers. If you’re just doing has many then the associated table should hold the parent id. If you need M:N associations, use a join table.
acrolink
Thanks. Actually, this is only part of the story. There will be a Restaurants table, each serving various dishes. There will be joins across them e.g. user <> dishes he likes <> restaurants serving those dishes. But since PostgreSQL supports those array of integer fields, I thought that could ensure good performane and make it easy to look up the associations.
benwilson512
I would definitely start with the “normal” way of modeling this in Postgres which would be via join tables, and then optimize when you’ve got millions of rows and you have specific access patterns you know you need to optimize for.
Hermanverschooten
I definitely agree with @benwilson512, not only are you complicating things, but you lose all referential integrity that way.
FlyingNoodle
We have done this at work and we are in a world of pain because of it.
Don’t do it.
D4no0
What kind of database size we are talking about?
If it’s under 200GB for a table, I wouldn’t even bother with any optimisations besides indexes on most used columns.
dimitarvp
Do it the boring and the seemingly-inefficient way, run it in production, measure, then think of optimizing it.
Don’t put the cart before the horse.