AstonJ
Have split this from the recent Ecto announcement where I think the quote below warrants some thought ![]()
What/how do you think the Elixir ecosystem could be advanced? ![]()
Anyone else excited by this? ![]()
Trending in Discussions
As the title says, please share what you’ve been up to with Elixir. Whether that’s been learning it, looking into it, making stuff with i...
New
Hey there,
It’s been more than a year since we started using LiveView as our main UI library and building a whole library of UI componen...
New
I want to open this thread for you all to discuss and help those who really like Ash but are still hesitant to use it in a real project. ...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Quite interesting article Google brought me. Didn’t find any mentions about it here.
What do you think in general? Would you use togethe...
New
:warning: Security advisory: Decimal DoS vulnerability
A vulnerability has been published for decimal where very large exponents can cau...
New
It would be helpful to have a list of companies worldwide that hire engineers without prior experience in Elixir. Often, it can be quite ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
praveenperera
Elixir Devise perhaps?
I’m very excited!
josevalim
Some mistakes should be committed just once.
svarlet
Unless they are idempotent.
mgwidmann
I think actually a large part of improving elixir can be done via improving erlang. For example, dialyzer has a lot of information about types that if presented properly to the user would be really beneficial. However, since running it is optional its not always done and new users as well as advanced users get tripped up on it and frequently end up not using it. I believe having elixir ship with the dialyzer plt and utilize as much information as makes sense in a more elixir styled presentation of the same information could bring a lot of improvement to the type system that people have been asking for, for some time.
dimitarvp
I absolutely agree that dialyzer needs some love. I for one don’t insist on statically typed Erlang / Elixir because that would deprive us of a lot of goodies. But better warning messages and more intuitive way to work with specs is something that will push both languages into the future.
I am pretty sure it’s hard as hell but in any case, I believe it’s one pain point that needs addressed. Whether it’s in 3 months or 3 years, it was a soft-blocker for me and I had to persist a lot to gain a basic understanding and be able to use specs relatively well. And even now parameterizing the specs is something that makes me scratch my head. I might be stupid though.
Additionally:
Standardizing Elixir’s configuration – compile-time, boot-time and run-time – is something that’s sorely needed to improve Elixir’s deployment story.
Speaking of which, Elixir’s deployment with Distillery could benefit from less WTH experience – there’s a bunch of stuff to setup if you want to deploy to your own VPS and it’s easy to get it wrong. I am betting $20 that it will take me more than 15 minutes even if we don’t count the time to install everything needed on a VPS / droplet.
dwahyudi
Easier debugging?
fuelen
What is hard in debugging?
david_ex
I’d be interested in reading more about “Devise was a mistake” (reasoning, lessons learned, etc.). Is there anything out there on this? I was unable to find anything (my searches just turn up user issues with errors/validations).
Or it simply a case of introducing a lot of complexity into projects with a simple gem install, i.e. going against the goal of simplicity that e.g. Rich Hickey talks about in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI8tNMsozo0 (such as shortly after 22:00)?
tme_317
I agree and am pretty sure there has been a lot of recent work committed in
dialyxirto get to v1 and present the dialyzer type warnings more understandably in Elixir format. Also JakeBecker’selixir-ls(by default) runs dialyzer automatically in the background as you work presenting these warnings. So I do think this will be getting a lot better soon.That said unfortunately an automatic inferred typing system looks to be out of reach for now (José’s ElixirConf speech https://youtu.be/suOzNeMJXl0?t=2563) so I’m hoping at this point something like a GitHub - josefs/Gradualizer: A Gradual type system for Erlang · GitHub approach will eventually advance the state of typing in the ecosystem.
OvermindDL1
On Elixir proper yes, but there is always the possibility to, for example, do a typed module definition that does the inference using a restricted set of Elixir, I started such an experiment and I’d love to complete it but I just don’t have the time (maybe someone else can get it going? ^.^).