Am I right to think that this diff:
- "bcrypt_elixir": {:hex, :bcrypt_elixir, "1.0.7", "e79d84b666bfad0e461ed217860e1c7de6bc4a1ae919cdb39d473ca784817653", [:make, :mix], [{:elixir_make, "~> 0.4", [hex: :elixir_make, repo: "hexpm", optional: false]}], "hexpm"},
+ "bcrypt_elixir": {:hex, :bcrypt_elixir, "1.0.7", "e79d84b666bfad0e461ed217860e1c7de6bc4a1ae919cdb39d473ca784817653", [:make, :mix], [{:elixir_make, "~> 0.4", [hex: :elixir_make, repo: "hexpm", optional: false]}], "hexpm", "acafec0a00cc76c1d7cd73245b0015cdc7c6667faee45d26920e07c495354c03"},
Means that the mix.lock file will now contain a checksum of all dependencies? @ericmj I am not criticising, simply trying to understand. I have to justify a rather big diff to our project’s mix.lock file and I am looking for the exact argumentation to present.
I strongly recommend not ignoring 
