I do not yet know the difference between “re-encode” and “re-pack/re-mux”. The following is current best guess, is it correct?
Suppose we have input streams A, B, C, D, E and we want to output A+0.5B+0.1C
-
re–pack/re-mux: we send the client 3 streams A, B, C; the client does out[t] = A[t] + 0.5B[t] + 0.1C[t] // in particular note that the client can thus prefectly recover A, B, and C
-
re-encode: the server does out[t] = A[t] + 0.5B[t] + 0.1C[t]; the server encodes out to a stream, and sends the client only a single stream // the client (without assuming structural properties) can’t directly access A, B, or C
^-- is the following correct for ‘re-encode’ vs ‘re-pack/re-mux’ ?
There’s a new library -