Would it be possible to resolve erlang code as well?
If I click on Map.fetch the map.ex file opens on the fetch function definition. In there, if I click on :maps.find it does not open maps.erl. This would be really helpful 
lud
0
JesseHerrick
Hey @knoebber, glad you’re enjoying it! I would argue that this isn’t necessarily a bug, but rather something we should leave to the editor to configure. When you do go-to-definition on a function with multiple function heads, the LSP will return all definitions for a function of that same arity. It would be incorrect to simply take you to the first function head found, since that might not be the applicable one.
That being said, I know not all editors make this easily configurable, so maybe we should make this an option after all. I see @nick-c opened a PR, so we can discuss there! Curious what others think about this.
0
JesseHerrick
lud
jaswdr
I installed it on Neovim, the difference is absurd, previously I had to wait few seconds for the project to compile and the LSP being available, now I just open the editor and it is up and running. As a noob in Elixir coming from Python and Go this is perfect for me, it doesn’t slows me down anymore.
Thank you for this tool, it is really useful.
3
bottlenecked
HI, now that it’s been a few months since the project was announced, I was wondering… how’s it going? Do you @JesseHerrick or Remote (the company) see yourselves extending and supporting it further?
2