Benchee 0.9.0 made it to release (Changelog). The main features are gathering more system data and some compatibility for calling benchee from erlang (sample project).
As a side note, I’m at Erlang User Conference atm and will also talk about benchmarking tomorrow. Feel free to come by and chat, love to do that (usually green t-shirt and/or Liefery pullover).
Hello again beloved elixirforum! After quite the break, 0.10 is here with hooks and other great improvements especially in the HTML formatter!
After long discussions of what the API of benchee ought to look like we decided for a drastical change - we need to change the name to bunny!
You can check out the bunny repository or get it straight from hex
Oh, sorry definitely will! Learners shouldn’t miss out on bunnytastic material 
Maybe I can coax @devonestes into doing it though? 
Devon, pleeasseeeee!
@PragTob is there an overview of the differences between the two api’s? They seem nearly identical to me.
From Benchee:
list = Enum.to_list(1..10_000)
map_fun = fn(i) -> [i, i * i] end
Benchee.run(%{
"flat_map" => fn -> Enum.flat_map(list, map_fun) end,
"map.flatten" => fn -> list |> Enum.map(map_fun) |> List.flatten end
}, time: 10)
From Bunny:
list = Enum.to_list(1..10_000)
map_fun = fn(i) -> [i, i * i] end
Bunny.eat(%{
"flat_map" => fn -> Enum.flat_map(list, map_fun) end,
"map.flatten" => fn -> list |> Enum.map(map_fun) |> List.flatten end
})
Or is the difference in functions other than the main benchmarking function?
This is a very obvious April Fools’ prank…
EDIT: it got me more or less until the code example that shows Bunny.eat(...).
Sorry if I really fooled anyone 
Wanted to make it really clear through hyperboles, version numbers (1.4.2018 ) and great new features like “bunny assistant” that it’s a joke so that nobody ends up changing all their code to use bunny.
If someone wants to continue using bunny - it’s totally usable. It’s only a thin wrapper around benchee with a couple of defdelegate’s and I don’t expect to break it.
To be doubly sure, I’m adding “this was a prank” notices everywhere applicable
@doomspork Thought about making a new post, but as I once made that for a new release or feature and they got merged together I thought it’s not the way things are supposed to be here
edit: can someone from the admins please change the title back? Thanks!
This is why this a bad idea. You’ve edited a real post and now require admins to come undo a prank.
I got Aprils Fools when I was a child. As an adult it seems like a waste of everyone’s time, now to include the forum admins who have to edit the post.
Edit: Furthermore, you’ve parked a package on Hex that no one else can use now as a prank. If everyone starts doing this hex will be a wasteland.
This is truly in poor taste
