sodapopcan
A little TIL regarding syntactic sugar
So this is just a dumb little post regarding syntax.
I’ve been pairing with a colleague who is new to Elixir lately and today we were briefly discussing how do/end is really syntactic sugar that essentially gets converted into a keyword list as [{:do, block}] and gets passed as the last argument to whatever is calling it. I was showing them how—while fairly useless—it even works with regular functions (not just macros) and I was creating modules with a single function in IEx to demonstrate. Afterwards this got me thinking if the following syntax would work:
foo = fn args ->
args[:do]
end
foo.() do
"bar"
end
Lo-and-behold it does!
Again, this is pretty useless in practice (and many of you are likely thinking “Sure, why wouldn’t that work?”) but it slightly expanded my own understanding of the ast/sugar ergonomics. Mostly I just thought it was cool and I’m home alone on a Friday night and I had to tell someone ![]()
If anyone has a better/different/(or even worse) way that they describe how do/end works, please feel free to share.
…and actually, are there practical uses of do/end for plain function functions I’m not thinking of?
Most Liked
gregvaughn
All of those different clauses that seem like language keywords that you can pass to the def macro, such as rescue, catch, else, after can be used in that implicit last keyword list argument. I’m pretty sure the parser limits to those atoms, which means you can’t pick arbitrary ones, however, knowing how that works could open up possibilities of cool macro features.
Aside: Yes, “Mad About You” was a fun 90’s sitcom ![]()
BartOtten
I like the fact that you explored the “but wait, what if?” I never thought of exploring the option ![]()
BartOtten
I’m not the greatest communicator
I thought about disagreeing with your statement until… ![]()
All is forgiven. You are so active in the community, I would not dare to be mad at you! Thanks for all your effort!
Fixed: “mad about you” is something else







