roflbobl

roflbobl

I have a problem, where i have a macro the calls another function. I want to be able to add optional guards to my macro, and call the nested function with those guards. I have a solution, but i feel like it is verbose and there is something i dont know of. Its the use of case do that feels clunky, and the only difference is the when clause.

Example

  defmacro assert_push(
             event,
             payload,
             timeout \\ 100
           ) do
    case payload do
      {:when, _, [pattern, guard]} ->
        quote do
          assert_receive %Phoenix.Socket.Message{
                           event: unquote(event),
                           payload: unquote(pattern)
                         }
                         when unquote(guard),
                         unquote(timeout)
        end

      _ ->
        quote do
          assert_receive %Phoenix.Socket.Message{
                           event: unquote(event),
                           payload: unquote(payload)
                         },
                         unquote(timeout)
        end
    end
  end

Showing Posts 1 to 7

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Honestly this looks fine to me—it’s nice and explicit. It’s not just the when clause that’s different but payload: unquote(pattern) v payload: unquote(payload). What you have is nice and explicit and I think DRYing it up would probably be more confusing (and hence a great case of “when DRY is too DRY”).

Although I see Chris K. is replying and he a notorious committer of macro crimes, so I’m interested to see what he’ll suggest :smiley:

christhekeele

christhekeele

Consider the (only semi-public but very stable) :elixir_utils.extract_guards/1 function from Elixir’s compiler. It takes in Macro AST of an expression, and returns a two-tuple of that expression with top-level guards removed, and a list of the guards extracted. Its implementation is similar to yours but handles multiple guards correctly (a rarely used feature in Elixir code, but syntactically valid).

Ex:

payload = quote(do: foo)
{pattern, guards} = :elixir_utils.extract_guards(payload)
#=> {{:foo, [], Elixir}, []}
payload = quote(do: foo when fizz)
{pattern, guards} = :elixir_utils.extract_guards(payload)
#=> {{:foo, [], Elixir}, [{:fizz, [], Elixir}]}
payload = quote(do: foo when fizz when buzz)
{pattern, guards} = :elixir_utils.extract_guards(payload)
#=> {{:foo, [], Elixir}, [{:fizz, [], Elixir}, {:buzz, [], Elixir}]}

You can then rebuild the guard AST around a new expression for insertion where desired without thinking about if there are zero or more by reducing over them:

new_guarded_expression = quote(do: bar)
Enum.reduce(guards, new_guarded_expression, fn guard, expression ->
  {:when, [], [expression, guard]}
end)
|> Macro.to_string
#=> "(bar when fizz) when buzz"
sodapopcan

sodapopcan

He did not disappoint, but also made me more confident in my resolve :grin: TIL about :elixir_utils.extract_guards which is very cool. But for what it’s worth, in a tense debugging session (or even just coming across it randomly in while trying to understand a system) I would much rather see your code.

christhekeele

christhekeele

ezgif-2296daa4eccd89

christhekeele

christhekeele

I’m inclined to agree if this macro is intended for an application. You control the version of Elixir at all points in time, control the calling code and can proceed with confidence that guards are not nested, and the simpler literal AST manipulation is more intention-revealing.

If it’s meant for a library there’s a small benefit in using these compiler functions (aside from handling nested guards): you’ll also know whatever version of Elixir the end user is running, your code will work for that version, whatever “correct” semantics of extracting guards are like for that version. (Not that the semantics of guards have ever changed or are likely to throughout Elixir ~> 1.0.)

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Yep, I’m glossing over a lot here, especially since OP’s code is clearly a test assertion. There is absolutely a huge difference in what’s acceptable in library v. application code and I was assuming this was for the latter (even if it is library-esque code within application code).

roflbobl

roflbobl OP

@christhekeele @sodapopcan this is actually from Phoenix, so it is library code. I wanted to add the functionality as stated in my post for testing.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews