snunezcr
I currently have a working Phoenix application with a well-defined set of routes. Each route roughly implements a CRUD interface, and the bulk of the code was generated using phx.gen.html.
What is the best practice around adding similar routes for a JSON API?
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
JohnnyCurran
mix phx.gen.jsonmix phx.gen.json — Phoenix v1.8.8snunezcr
Thanks. I should have been more specific. Can I reuse the existing schemas, and only create API routes?
maz
I would say you definitely want to reuse the existing schemas. In your views you can determine what you return in the JSON response. So if there are values you don’t want to return, don’t include them in the response. If there values from different schemas you want to return in the same response, you need to make an ecto query that joins them.
kokolegorille
schemas yes, contextes yes… but You will need to create controllers, fallback_controller, views as well.
another options would be to use graphql. You could reuse almost everything, You just need to add graphql schemas
JohnnyCurran
Yes - Use the
--no-contextand--no-schemaflags. Like this:mix phx.gen.json Accounts User users --no-context --no-schemaThis will look in
lib/proj/accounts/user.exand generate a JSON api route for the schema defined at that file. It will not try to recreate a context module nor a new schemaThe order of arguments to the command is:
mix phx.gen.json Context Schema db_tableContextis the phoenix context,Schemais your Elixir schema, anddb_tableis the table in your database thatSchemais linked togcb
Doing as the accepted solution today will overwrite the phx.gen.html controller file. The json controller will be missing methods as new/2, edit/2. and the remaining create/2, update/2, delete/2 will lose the error render.
I think the solution is to also use the
--webparameter, but it doesn’t seem clear from the linked doc above. It will simply create a new sub context. no way to use the same controllers… I am not sure what is the advantage of fiddling with the “app namespace” versus the context.