Yea I agree with @eksperimental here, this use of macros generally causes more trouble than it’s worth.

If you find yourself with functions that take too many arguments, consider creating a struct and then passing on that struct. For example:

defmodule SomeModule do
  defstruct [shared1: "a", shared2: "b", foo: nil, bar: nil]
end

Then you construct a %SomeModule{} struct and it will take on the relevant defaults, and also provide a place to store other values you want to set. Then you can pass this to your various functions, and add extra arguments as appropriate.

@vrod I’ll start by saying: If this is a problem you’re running into, you are 100% putting too much inside of a __using__ block. Code inside of a using block should generally look like this:

defmodule SomeThing do
  defmacro __using__(opts) do
    quote do
      def foo(arg) do
        SomeThing.foo(__MODULE__, arg)
      end
    end
  end

  def foo(module, arg) do
    # complex multi-line implementation here
  end
end

NOT

defmodule SomeThing do
  defmacro __using__(opts) do
    quote do
      def foo(arg) do
        # complex multi-line implementation here
      end
    end
  end
end

Doing it the first way will improve compile times, debugging ability, and avoid the problem you are running into.

BUT, to actually answer your question, you can do this;

defmacro __using__(opts) do
  [
    first_part_stuff(opts),
    second_part_stuff(opts),
  ]
end

defp first_part_stuff(opts) do
  quote do
    # things here
  end
end

defp second_part_stuff(opts) do
  quote do
    # things here
  end
end

Basically, return a list of quote do blocks.

You can @doc false those functions if you want to make it clear that they aren’t supposed to be used.