dkuhlman
I’ve been doing some work to try to make processing XML documents a
little easier and more intuitive. I’ve built the ability to transform
the xmerl records produced by SweetXml into Elixir Structs.
One benefit of doing this is that you can use dot-notation and (in
IEx) tab completion to reference sub-components of various objects.
For example, if you have an XML element in a variable element1,
then you can use the following to reference its name (tag) and
children:
element1.name
element1.content
I’ve also implemented a small set of helper functions.
See the README for more info.
If you’d like to try it, you can find it here:
https://github.com/dkuhlman/xmlelixirstructs
You can include it in your mix project by adding the following
dependency to your mix.exs:
{:xmlelixirstructs, github: "dkuhlman/xmlelixirstructs"},
If you try it and have comments or suggestions, I’d like to hear
them.
Dave
Trending in Discussions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
Eiji
When reading this I expected something different …
It would be nice if you could provide a API which looks like:
mapper_moduleshould be a module which implements specific behaviour which let’s say implements such set of functions:struct_mapper/1,content_mapper/2andcast_func/3.struct_mappershould be a function which determines module name based on tag, for example:content_mappershould be a function which determines where specifictagshould be added to structcast_funcshould be a function likechangesetfunction used inecto-based projects, for example:Those examples instead of generic predefined structs would allow to nicely
castanyXMLdata into current application structs which would simplify business logic much.Please notice that with slight changes to
mapper_module(I provided just a simple example) you should be able to write a defaultmapper_moduleto match your actual predefined structs. That solution would be easier for smaller scripts which does not definesectoschemas or similar stuff.What do you think about it?