martijn
In my first Phoenix app, I have an action which serves an XML phonebook to a certain SIP handset. The handset has two ways of calling this action:
/gigaset?reqsrc=user&ln=foo # Search for a contact with the name 'foo'
/gigaset?reqsrc=auto&hm=12345 # Search for a contact with caller ID 12345
Since both have different queries I decided to pattern match based on the reqsrc parameter. But both action have some shared logic as well, so I put that in a separate method with the same name but different arity to apply limit and offset and render the view/template. It works, but is this the right way of doing things?
# User quering phonebook from Gigaset base
def gigaset(conn, params = %{"reqsrc" => "user"}) do
name = String.replace(params["ln"], "*", "%")
query = from e in Entry, where: ilike(e.name, ^name)
gigaset conn, query, params
end
# Caller ID from Gigaset base
def gigaset(conn, params = %{"reqsrc" => "auto"}) do
number = params["hm"]
query = from e in Entry, where: e.work == ^number or e.home == ^number or e.mobile == ^number
gigaset conn, query
end
# Finish query, render output
def gigaset(conn, query, params) do
limit = String.to_integer(params["count"])
offset = String.to_integer(params["first"]) - 1
query = from e in query, limit: ^limit, offset: ^offset
entries = Repo.all(query)
render conn, entries: entries
end
I know the difference in the query is trivial, but imagine they would be vastly different. Does it make sense to do it like this?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley:
Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Hello
I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
Hi everyone :waving_hand:
I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #code-sync
- #discussion
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
martijn
Wait.. after testing it again it seems to not work as expected
Requesting
/gigaset?reqsrc=autoyields a ‘no matching action clause to process request’ error on the definition of the first method. Is there a way to do this, at all?I ended up rewriting into this long method (with some more changes):
All feedback is welcome! I realise some of this belongs in the model probably.
sashaafm
I don’t think there’s any problem in using pattern matching in controller methods. I’ve done this in one of my projects myself and it works great:
NobbZ
Your match does only “fire” when you have all the parameters
"reqsrc","count", and"first"available. In the requested “path”/gigaset?reqsrc=auto"there is only"reqsrc"available, so you need to add another clause after your current one, which needs to be like this: