acrolink
I am considering using Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Limitless Database in my next project. There will be very large amounts of data and this solution seems to handle built-in most of the scaling and sharding concerns.
My questions:
- Any experiences doing this in a Phoenix / Ecto based application ?!
- Can regular migration files be used ?!
- Any general thoughs on this ?!
Thank you.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
garrison
I have not used Aurora, but I believe they are quite compatible with Postgres (last I remember it’s a fork with a new backend - maybe different now), so you should be able to use Ecto with no issues.
I do remember seeing a post on here about weird latency characteristics with Oban using Aurora - I don’t remember if they sorted it out or how big of a deal it was, but you could search for it.
VictorGaiva
In general, I personally would avoid going to fully managed “customized” solution as it could result in vender lock-in, which is kind of AWS’s whole business model.
It usually costs very little when starting, and it might actually cost them money to provide you the service, but ends up costing a whole lot more if you get to scale pass a point, where they end up getting back their money.
That being said, if you don’t plan to scale past a certain point and is not worried about possibly having to migrate to another service when they inevitably increase their pricing, you should be good.
garrison
I agree about AWS/Cloud in general but this is managed Postgres so you can always take your backups and run. Postgres is quite possibly the only database left that we can say for certain won’t be rugpulled, which is why we all use it!
acrolink
@VictorGaiva .. I agree, seems better to implement and manage sharding at application level so I can avoid vendor lock. This way, I can still use regular migration commands for Ecto.
Besides that, to even start using the Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Limitless Database, there is a minimum requirement of running 16 ACU / Hour service, which is around 2,200 USD / Month! To just start using managed sharding