rajagennu

rajagennu

Hello,

I am testing below code

fibonaci = fn
  0 -> 0
  1 -> 1
   n -> fibonaci.(n-1) + fibonaic.(n-2)
end

IO.puts fibonaci.(10)

I am getting error as

elixir fibonaci.ex
warning: variable "fibonaci" does not exist and is being expanded to "fibonaci()", please use parentheses to remove the ambiguity or change the variable name
  fibonaci.ex:4

** (CompileError) fibonaci.ex:4: undefined function fibonaci/0 (there is no such import)

Please help, Thank you.

Showing Posts 1 to 5

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

Elixir doesn‘t have recursive anonymous functions.

NobbZ

NobbZ

The best thing you can do, is to use 2 variables:

fib_ = fn
  0, f -> 0
  1, f -> 1
  n, f -> f.(n-1) + f.(n-2)
end

fib = fn(n) -> fib_(n, fib_) end

IO.puts fib.(10)

Please beware the autocorrection.

emadb

emadb

Or you can use the Y-combinator! :slight_smile:

Seriously, I suggest to find a different implementation, even though I thing learning the Y Combinator has its importance.

ds604

ds604

I wanted to be able to do this too, since sometimes I don’t want a whole module just to test a function. I found somewhere someone showed to do it like this:

fib = fn
  1, _ -> 1
  2, _ -> 1
  n, recur -> recur.(n - 1, recur) + recur.(n - 2, recur)
end

fib.(10, fib) |> IO.puts()

Put recur (or whatever stand-in name you want) within the function, to stand for the name of the function. Then when you call the function, pass the name to itself.

======================
Notes:
(I’m trying to take some notes as I go about learning, so just putting this here so I can find it) This ergonomic issue seems relevant to individuals who arrive at Elixir through the path of Livebooks, since it suggests the use case of software development over interactive computing. Building up functionality bit by bit with little functions would be the natural path in an exploratory environment. So having to reach for a module this early on, or otherwise having to understand this slightly arcane syntax, might put off people who are looking for simple, straightforward things to be simple and straightforward, or are translating from another language.

  • Present as-is, without the need to explain y combinator
  • Livebook having an optional module wrapper might allow the style of writing plain functions
  • Rosetta code-style translator
hauleth

hauleth

If you feel adventurous then you can check out my small macro that I have created for this purpose:

defmodule Foo do
  defmacro fn_rec(do: body) do
    {name, argc, body} =
      body
      |> Enum.map(fn
        {:'->', e1, [[{:when, e2, [{name, _, args}, guard]}], body]} ->
          {name, length(args), {:'->', e1, [[{:when, e2, args ++ [guard]}], body]}}

        {:'->', e1, [[{name, _, args}], body]} ->
          {name, length(args), {:'->', e1, [args, body]}}
      end)
      |> Enum.reduce(fn {name, argc, body}, {name, argc, acc} ->
        {name, argc, List.wrap(acc) ++ [body]}
      end)

    args = Macro.generate_arguments(argc, __CALLER__.module)
    func = {:fn, [], body}
    name = {name, [], Elixir}

    quote do
      tmp =
        fn f ->
          var!(unquote(name)) = fn unquote_splicing(args) -> f.(f).(unquote_splicing(args)) end
          unquote(func)
        end

      tmp.(tmp)
    end
  end

  def run do
    ack =
      fn_rec do
        a(0, n) -> n + 1
        a(m, 0) -> a.(m - 1, 1)
        a(m, n) -> a.(m - 1, a.(m, n - 1))
      end

    ack.(3, 4)
  end
end

IO.puts Foo.run
— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews