tmariaz
My API which authenticates via auth0 and returns the access_token. During the callback, the access_token throws invalid_token error. Not sure what is going on.
Here are my codes.
router.ex
scope "/auth", PxrfWeb do
pipe_through [:browser]
get "/:provider", AuthController, :request
get "/:provider/callback", AuthController, :callback
end
config.exs
config :pxrf, Pxrf.Auth.Guardian,
issuer: "https://myissuer.xx.auth0.com/",
secret_key: "xxxxxxxx"
auth_controller.ex
...
def callback(%{assigns: %{ueberauth_auth: auth}} = conn, %{"state" => state} = _params) do
IO.inspect(auth)
token = auth.extra.raw_info.token.access_token
case Pxrf.Auth.Guardian.decode_and_verify(token) do
{:ok, claims} ->
user = Accounts.get_user_by_username(claims["sub"])
{:error, _reason} ->
nil
end
end
...
When I run the following
iex> Guardian.decode_and_verify("eyJasds-----access-token-")
{:error, :invalid_token}
Been breaking my head for the past couple of days and can’t figure it out what is wrong. Looks like all my configuration and setup in the auth0 application seems to be correct. But still no luck.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
tmariaz
Tried 2 methods
Method 1
Method 2
Not sure which method is correct?
codeanpeace
Are you using this Auth0 Ueberauth strategy?
https://github.com/achedeuzot/ueberauth_auth0
If so, take a look at the callback functions in
auth_controller.exfrom the ueberauth example repo:tmariaz
Yes I am using ueberauth_auth0 Strategy.
config.exs
I wanted to use the Method 1 I’ve mentioned above whereby a user login with their auth0 credentials and which in return sends back the
access_token. So I wanted to pass that token to my protected api. When I do that I getinvalid_tokenerror.I have the follow pipeline and I think the error is thrown from there.
Still no luck decoding and verifying the token with the following
Also tried Method 2 and with the access_token still can’t decode and verify. Am I missing something?
Btw “
secret_key” and “client_secret” of Guardian and auth0 strategy is same.codeanpeace
If you peek inside the plug
Guardian.Plug.VerifyHeader, you can see that it already handles decoding and verifying the header on line 92.https://github.com/ueberauth/guardian/blob/v2.3.1/lib/guardian/plug/verify_header.ex#L92
So the invalid token error is likely from attempting to decode and verify a token that’s already been decoded and verified. If you take another look at the example in my previous post, it shows how the two
callbackfunction heads check for authentication success or failure in theconn.tmariaz
Is that means when I pass the token it is already validated and the current_resource is set into the connection? But I’m sending a valid token which I retrieved from auth0 login. If it is validated inside VerifyHeader then it is still throwing
invalid_tokenerror. What am I doing wrong?Let’s say if I comment out the VerifyHeader and it throws unauthenticated error.
Error:
I checked with jwt.io for the validity of the token and it is valid though. Still breaking my head. Sorry for being noob.
codeanpeace
The token is already validated when it reaches the
callbackfunction inauth_controller.exso you shouldn’t be callingdecode_and_verifyagain in the controller.The presence of the
ueberauth_failurekey withinconn.assignsindicates that it unsuccessfully ran through the Guardian pipeline whereas the presence ofueberauth_authindicates that it successfully ran through the Guardian pipeline, including verifying the sesson and header, ensuring authentication, and loading resource.If you want to access
claims["sub"], I suggest youIO.inspect(conn)and it should already be there.https://github.com/achedeuzot/ueberauth_auth0/blob/de1964785a3d8dc47fba2eb850345f0028b46651/lib/ueberauth/strategy/auth0.ex#L1-L13
https://github.com/achedeuzot/ueberauth_auth0/blob/de1964785a3d8dc47fba2eb850345f0028b46651/lib/ueberauth/strategy/auth0.ex#L193-L198
So since you’re using this
ueberauth_auth0strategy, you should be able to do something likeconn.private.auth0_user["sub"].If you comment out the
VerifyHeaderplug, it would make sense that a subsequent plug in the pipeline e.g.EnsureAuthenticatedmight fail with an unauthenticated error.tmariaz
Hey,
First of all thanks for the help. I found the problem with the Guardian algo. The current version of the algo is HS512 by default. However my token isn’t. I had to add the following algo to the config file. It partially work with VerifyHeader in the pipeline.
config.exs
However now I get another new problem.
pipeline.ex
Doesn’t work with claims param
Works without the claims param
Is it safer to do this?
But why with claims params I still get
invalid_tokenerror?codeanpeace
If it doesn’t work when specifying the claims param but works without, that suggests the
"typ"key in the decoded:claimsmap is not actually set to"access". Have you checked viaIO.inspectto see if it’s something else? Could you share what the decoded JWT and/orconnlooks like?For example, if the decoded claims response looks like this example from the Use Access Token | Auth0 docs, then
"typ"might be something like"JWT".tmariaz
Yea… I get
"typ":"JWT"so can I change the claim toJWTinstead ofaccess?Decoded JWT
codeanpeace
Yup, what you pass into claims option gets checked against the decoded token.
source: guardian/lib/guardian/plug/verify_header.ex at master · ueberauth/guardian · GitHub
Try this:
plug Guardian.Plug.VerifyHeader, scheme: "Bearer", claims: %{"typ" => "JWT"}