gordoneliel
I have a resource, eg Post, where the post has many Authors. When creating a Post, there should be at least one (1) Author attached to the payload. I know the json api v1 spec does not really outline creating multiple resources at once, but I figured we should be able to regardless?
What I’ve tried so far:
- Passing the relationship in the relationships section of the body - This fails with stack
[error] GenServer #PID<0.767.0> terminating
** (FunctionClauseError) no function clause matching in anonymous fn/2 in AshJsonApi.Request.relationship_change_value/1
(ash_json_api 0.33.1) lib/ash_json_api/request.ex:668: anonymous fn(:error, {:ok, []}) in AshJsonApi.Request.relationship_change_value/1
(elixir 1.15.7) lib/enum.ex:4387: anonymous fn/3 in Enum.reduce/3
- Passing the relationship into the
Postattributes when creating - This does not work, throws an invalid body because theAuthorattribute is not an attribute on the resource but rather a relationship.
I combed through the relationships section of Ash and AshJsonApi but cant seem to find anything related to creating multiple related resources.
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
zachdaniel
The best way to go about this is to use
manage_relationshipi.eThen you can provide that as an input.
gordoneliel
I did try that with #1.
This got somewhere but seems to need an
idattribute in the relationship. When I add that none of the other attributes in the relationship make it to the changeset attributes underauthors.The other way was to put the relationship in the attributes
This did not work either, gave a invalid attribute error
zachdaniel
It should be done in the attributes when using that strategy IIRC. It’s been a while since I looked at that particular code. What invalid attribute error are you getting?
gordoneliel
Getting:
Expected only defined properties, got key ["data", "attributes", "authors"].This is my create action:
zachdaniel
Okay, I can see it now, yeah. It should be in the relationships, but the issue is that we are currently requiring
id, which doesn’t make sense in all contexts. I’ve just pushed something tomainto make those optional. Additionally, extra attributes have to go in the"meta"key of the relationship, i.e{type: "type", "meta" => {foo: "bar"}}. This is required by the spec, IIRC.gordoneliel
I think that would work! The json api spec for v1 is a little weird with this, I wonder if the upcoming v1.2 spec makes it easier to do this
gordoneliel
On a similar note, I have a situation where I have to create a
Comment.When creating a comment it should have the associated
Postit belongs to. I know we can get the data on a related resource for eg. GET/post/:id/comments, but when I try to send a ‘POST’ request to the same url, I get aroute not founderror.Question is, how do we post to a related resource? I tried just posting to the direct resource url, eg
/comments, but then I have to manually attach the relationship, and create two different actions on theCommentresource, one for when creating the comment through aPost(I would like to be able to create a comment when creating a new Post), and another when creating a comment after aPosthas been created.gordoneliel
Honestly not sure what the idiomatic way for JSONApi would be.
Should I have a
PATCHonPosteg/post/:id/comment, route: "/:id/contributors"(this is on post json_api routes), and an action on thePostresource that delegates creation of theCommentthrough the managed relationship? Or should it be aPOSTon/post/:id/commentsthat goes directly to theCommentcreate action?Example for reference:
zachdaniel
So, that part is actually still based on old behavior, and probably needs to be upgraded at some point. What it does is use the primary action and explicitly adds
Changeset.manage_relationship(instead of it being an argument in an action).So you can do this in routes:
gordoneliel
I do have that on the Post resource, but getting a
no route foundwhen hitting POST/post/:id/comments