gordoneliel
I have a resource, eg Post, where the post has many Authors. When creating a Post, there should be at least one (1) Author attached to the payload. I know the json api v1 spec does not really outline creating multiple resources at once, but I figured we should be able to regardless?
What I’ve tried so far:
- Passing the relationship in the relationships section of the body - This fails with stack
[error] GenServer #PID<0.767.0> terminating
** (FunctionClauseError) no function clause matching in anonymous fn/2 in AshJsonApi.Request.relationship_change_value/1
(ash_json_api 0.33.1) lib/ash_json_api/request.ex:668: anonymous fn(:error, {:ok, []}) in AshJsonApi.Request.relationship_change_value/1
(elixir 1.15.7) lib/enum.ex:4387: anonymous fn/3 in Enum.reduce/3
- Passing the relationship into the
Postattributes when creating - This does not work, throws an invalid body because theAuthorattribute is not an attribute on the resource but rather a relationship.
I combed through the relationships section of Ash and AshJsonApi but cant seem to find anything related to creating multiple related resources.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
zachdaniel
The best way to go about this is to use
manage_relationshipi.eThen you can provide that as an input.
gordoneliel
I did try that with #1.
This got somewhere but seems to need an
idattribute in the relationship. When I add that none of the other attributes in the relationship make it to the changeset attributes underauthors.The other way was to put the relationship in the attributes
This did not work either, gave a invalid attribute error
zachdaniel
It should be done in the attributes when using that strategy IIRC. It’s been a while since I looked at that particular code. What invalid attribute error are you getting?
gordoneliel
Getting:
Expected only defined properties, got key ["data", "attributes", "authors"].This is my create action:
zachdaniel
Okay, I can see it now, yeah. It should be in the relationships, but the issue is that we are currently requiring
id, which doesn’t make sense in all contexts. I’ve just pushed something tomainto make those optional. Additionally, extra attributes have to go in the"meta"key of the relationship, i.e{type: "type", "meta" => {foo: "bar"}}. This is required by the spec, IIRC.gordoneliel
I think that would work! The json api spec for v1 is a little weird with this, I wonder if the upcoming v1.2 spec makes it easier to do this
gordoneliel
On a similar note, I have a situation where I have to create a
Comment.When creating a comment it should have the associated
Postit belongs to. I know we can get the data on a related resource for eg. GET/post/:id/comments, but when I try to send a ‘POST’ request to the same url, I get aroute not founderror.Question is, how do we post to a related resource? I tried just posting to the direct resource url, eg
/comments, but then I have to manually attach the relationship, and create two different actions on theCommentresource, one for when creating the comment through aPost(I would like to be able to create a comment when creating a new Post), and another when creating a comment after aPosthas been created.gordoneliel
Honestly not sure what the idiomatic way for JSONApi would be.
Should I have a
PATCHonPosteg/post/:id/comment, route: "/:id/contributors"(this is on post json_api routes), and an action on thePostresource that delegates creation of theCommentthrough the managed relationship? Or should it be aPOSTon/post/:id/commentsthat goes directly to theCommentcreate action?Example for reference:
zachdaniel
So, that part is actually still based on old behavior, and probably needs to be upgraded at some point. What it does is use the primary action and explicitly adds
Changeset.manage_relationship(instead of it being an argument in an action).So you can do this in routes:
gordoneliel
I do have that on the Post resource, but getting a
no route foundwhen hitting POST/post/:id/comments