rapidfsub
This is a test code for ash_state_machine.
https://github.com/rapidfsub/sonet/blob/develop/test/sonet_lib/ash_state_machine/common_test.exs#L48
assert Ashex.can?({object, :progress}, nil) == false
This assertion passes, so I think there is no permission.
assert {:error, %Ash.Error.Forbidden{}} = Ashex.run_update(object, :progress, actor: nil)
But this assertion does not pass, because the Object.progress action fails with Ash.Error.Invalid.
I think action call without permission should return Ash.Error.Forbidden.
And Ash.Error.Invalid looks like a validation error.
Is this a bug?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security











Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
zachdaniel
Ash.can?is “is valid and is allowed” by default. Try usingAsh.canand see what kind of error is returned.rapidfsub
“valid” means validity of policies?
Not the validity determined by validations?
zachdaniel
I’m referring to the validity of the changeset itself. The reason for this is that validations and changes run before authorization.
zachdaniel
Any changes or validations that should run after authorization should use
before_action?: true(in the case of validations) orAsh.Changeset.before_actionin the case of changes.rapidfsub
I think I have bad understandig at
policyandcanfunction.So I need to study more about them.
I have a small question.
Would you give me a scenario, when does the
canfunction return{:ok, :maybe}?zachdaniel
{:ok, :maybe}would be returned in the case of filter policies on read actions, when the data to be read isn’t provided, andrun_queries?is set tofalse. So to answer we’d have to run the queries, so we’d have to say:maybe.rapidfsub
Thank you for your explanation.
rapidfsub
Ok, now I got it about my original question.
My Conclusions
Ash.can
{:ok, true}when policy pass (even if validation fail){:ok, false}when policy failError returned by action
Ash.Error.Forbiddenwhen only policy failAsh.Error.Invalidwhen only validation failAsh.Error.Invalidwhen policy and validation failWhy return
Ash.Error.Invalidwhen policy and validation fail?splodechoose first error class when combine(Get Started with Splode — splode v0.3.1)
Is this correct? @zachdaniel
rapidfsub
I got these conclusions with below test codes.
This is my
ash_state_machinetest code.https://github.com/rapidfsub/sonet/blob/develop/test/sonet_lib/ash_state_machine/common_test.exs
And this is
my authorization_validation_priority_test.exs.https://github.com/rapidfsub/sonet/blob/develop/test/sonet_lib/ash/research/authorization_validation_priority_test.exs
zachdaniel
A better way to phrase this would be that when running the action, policies aren’t run on invalid actions.