i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r

Suppose my LiveComponent contains some complex state.
In my liveview template I need to get some values that are nested inside that state.
For example the state contains a map: assigns.x.y.z.my_map and I need to get various values from my_map.
How would I assign my_map to a variable inside my template?

Currently I’m creating a list so that I can use for.
That doesn’t seem right though.

def render(assigns), do: ~L"""
  <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
    <%= for m <- [assigns.x.y.z.my_map] do %>
      <ul>
        <li><%= m.foo %></li>
        <li><%= m.bar %></li>
        <li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
      <ul>
    <% end %>
  </section>
"""

I don’t want to do this:

def render(%{x: %{y: %{z: %{my_map: m}}}} = assigns), do:

Maybe something like this?

def render(assigns), do:
  render(assigns, assigns.x.y.z.my_map)

defp render(assigns, m), do: ~L"""
  <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
    <ul>
      <li><%= m.foo %></li>
      <li><%= m.bar %></li>
      <li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
    <ul>
  </section>
"""

I’m not sure how either approach would affect performance and/or have side effects.

Showing Posts 1 to 6

Nicd

Nicd

Would this work?

def render(assigns) do
  m = assings.x.y.z.my_map
  ~L"""
    <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
      <ul>
        <li><%= m.foo %></li>
        <li><%= m.bar %></li>
        <li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
      <ul>
    </section>
  """
end
i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r OP

I’m afraid not, from the docs:

Similarly, do not define variables at the top of your render function:

def render(assigns) do
  sum = assigns.x + assigns.y

  ~L"""
  <%= sum %>
  """
end

Also from the docs:

To sum up:

  1. Avoid passing block expressions to library and custom functions
  2. Never do anything on def render(assigns) besides rendering a template or invoking the ~L sigil
  3. Avoid defining local variables, except within for , case , and friends

When the contents of assigns is complex, this gets ugly fast.

All of this change tracking stuff is pretty hard to grasp.

Also, when you have a lot of nested LiveComponents, the assigns are not as simple/clean as the examples in the docs.
Suppose component x > y > z > foo has some setting bar, that’s not as simple as @bar.

wolf4earth

wolf4earth

AFAIK you can use <% my_map = assigns.x.y.z.my_map %>:

def render(assigns), do: ~L"""
  <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
    <% m = assigns.x.y.z.my_map %>
    <ul>
      <li><%= m.foo %></li>
      <li><%= m.bar %></li>
      <li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
    </ul>
  </section>
"""
i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r OP

Without any penalty ?

Avoid defining local variables [..]

wolf4earth

wolf4earth

You’re right, I’ve checked the docs and you should not do that:

Another pitfall of .leex templates is related to variables. Due to the scope of variables, LiveView has to disable change tracking whenever variables are used in the template, with the exception of variables introduced by Elixir basic case , for , and other block constructs. Therefore, you must avoid code like this in your LiveEEx:

<% some_var = @x + @y %>
<%= some_var %>

Instead it’s recommended to use a function:

sum(@x, @y)

So in your case you could do this:

def render(assigns), do: ~L"""
  <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
    <ul>
      <li><%= my_map(@x).foo %></li>
      <li><%= my_map(@x).bar %></li>
      <li><%= parse_qux(my_map(@x).qux) %></li>
    </ul>
  </section>
"""

Where my_map is defined like this (or using pattern matching):

def my_map(x), do: x.y.z.my_map
i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r OP

I guess maybe that’s the way to go.
There must be some reason though why the docs say “avoid” instead of “never ever”.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
ryanwinchester
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted” Version...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New

Latest on Elixir Forum

Elixir Forum

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews