i-n-g-m-a-r
Suppose my LiveComponent contains some complex state.
In my liveview template I need to get some values that are nested inside that state.
For example the state contains a map: assigns.x.y.z.my_map and I need to get various values from my_map.
How would I assign my_map to a variable inside my template?
Currently I’m creating a list so that I can use for.
That doesn’t seem right though.
def render(assigns), do: ~L"""
<section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
<%= for m <- [assigns.x.y.z.my_map] do %>
<ul>
<li><%= m.foo %></li>
<li><%= m.bar %></li>
<li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
<ul>
<% end %>
</section>
"""
I don’t want to do this:
def render(%{x: %{y: %{z: %{my_map: m}}}} = assigns), do:
Maybe something like this?
def render(assigns), do:
render(assigns, assigns.x.y.z.my_map)
defp render(assigns, m), do: ~L"""
<section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
<ul>
<li><%= m.foo %></li>
<li><%= m.bar %></li>
<li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
<ul>
</section>
"""
I’m not sure how either approach would affect performance and/or have side effects.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
Nicd
Would this work?
i-n-g-m-a-r
I’m afraid not, from the docs:
Also from the docs:
When the contents of assigns is complex, this gets ugly fast.
All of this change tracking stuff is pretty hard to grasp.
Also, when you have a lot of nested LiveComponents, the assigns are not as simple/clean as the examples in the docs.
Suppose component x > y > z > foo has some setting bar, that’s not as simple as @bar.
wolf4earth
AFAIK you can use
<% my_map = assigns.x.y.z.my_map %>:i-n-g-m-a-r
Without any penalty ?
wolf4earth
You’re right, I’ve checked the docs and you should not do that:
Instead it’s recommended to use a function:
So in your case you could do this:
Where
my_mapis defined like this (or using pattern matching):i-n-g-m-a-r
I guess maybe that’s the way to go.
There must be some reason though why the docs say “avoid” instead of “never ever”.