i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r

Suppose my LiveComponent contains some complex state.
In my liveview template I need to get some values that are nested inside that state.
For example the state contains a map: assigns.x.y.z.my_map and I need to get various values from my_map.
How would I assign my_map to a variable inside my template?

Currently I’m creating a list so that I can use for.
That doesn’t seem right though.

def render(assigns), do: ~L"""
  <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
    <%= for m <- [assigns.x.y.z.my_map] do %>
      <ul>
        <li><%= m.foo %></li>
        <li><%= m.bar %></li>
        <li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
      <ul>
    <% end %>
  </section>
"""

I don’t want to do this:

def render(%{x: %{y: %{z: %{my_map: m}}}} = assigns), do:

Maybe something like this?

def render(assigns), do:
  render(assigns, assigns.x.y.z.my_map)

defp render(assigns, m), do: ~L"""
  <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
    <ul>
      <li><%= m.foo %></li>
      <li><%= m.bar %></li>
      <li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
    <ul>
  </section>
"""

I’m not sure how either approach would affect performance and/or have side effects.

Showing Posts 1 to 6

Nicd

Nicd

Would this work?

def render(assigns) do
  m = assings.x.y.z.my_map
  ~L"""
    <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
      <ul>
        <li><%= m.foo %></li>
        <li><%= m.bar %></li>
        <li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
      <ul>
    </section>
  """
end
i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r OP

I’m afraid not, from the docs:

Similarly, do not define variables at the top of your render function:

def render(assigns) do
  sum = assigns.x + assigns.y

  ~L"""
  <%= sum %>
  """
end

Also from the docs:

To sum up:

  1. Avoid passing block expressions to library and custom functions
  2. Never do anything on def render(assigns) besides rendering a template or invoking the ~L sigil
  3. Avoid defining local variables, except within for , case , and friends

When the contents of assigns is complex, this gets ugly fast.

All of this change tracking stuff is pretty hard to grasp.

Also, when you have a lot of nested LiveComponents, the assigns are not as simple/clean as the examples in the docs.
Suppose component x > y > z > foo has some setting bar, that’s not as simple as @bar.

wolf4earth

wolf4earth

AFAIK you can use <% my_map = assigns.x.y.z.my_map %>:

def render(assigns), do: ~L"""
  <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
    <% m = assigns.x.y.z.my_map %>
    <ul>
      <li><%= m.foo %></li>
      <li><%= m.bar %></li>
      <li><%= parse_qux(m.qux) %></li>
    </ul>
  </section>
"""
i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r OP

Without any penalty ?

Avoid defining local variables [..]

wolf4earth

wolf4earth

You’re right, I’ve checked the docs and you should not do that:

Another pitfall of .leex templates is related to variables. Due to the scope of variables, LiveView has to disable change tracking whenever variables are used in the template, with the exception of variables introduced by Elixir basic case , for , and other block constructs. Therefore, you must avoid code like this in your LiveEEx:

<% some_var = @x + @y %>
<%= some_var %>

Instead it’s recommended to use a function:

sum(@x, @y)

So in your case you could do this:

def render(assigns), do: ~L"""
  <section id="<%= assigns.x.id %>">
    <ul>
      <li><%= my_map(@x).foo %></li>
      <li><%= my_map(@x).bar %></li>
      <li><%= parse_qux(my_map(@x).qux) %></li>
    </ul>
  </section>
"""

Where my_map is defined like this (or using pattern matching):

def my_map(x), do: x.y.z.my_map
i-n-g-m-a-r

i-n-g-m-a-r OP

I guess maybe that’s the way to go.
There must be some reason though why the docs say “avoid” instead of “never ever”.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
Blokh
Hey guys, I’ve got a huge CSV ( around 10 GB ) that needs to be processed hourly Do you guys have any suggestions what is the best prac...
New
kszambelanczyk
Hello! Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app. I creat...
New
Onor.io
I have what I’ve heard referred to as a “lookup table” in my database. This is a way of assigning codes to common values. One common lo...
New
jaybe78
Hello, I’m developing a online persistent chat system (what’s app) like using elixir/dynamodb/aws for a mobile app(flutter). The diffic...
New
Trolleger
What approach to take when sending live updates to “random” users Hi! I have a question, I have a little chat app, and when I create a DM...
New
widianto
I think I’ve found a small improvement I could contribute to &lt;%= web_namespace %&gt;.CoreComponents (installer/templates/phx_web/compo...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mcass19
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge &amp; Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
wintermeyer
There are three potential reasons for members of this forum to have a look at https://vutuv.de You are tired or annoyed of LinkedIn. Yo...
New
aseigo
ICal is a library for interacting with iCalendar data. It parses iCalendars into typed Elixir structs via ICal.from_ics, and can prepare ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews