hst337
The benchmark
Mix.install [:benchee]
defmodule X do
def dot(map) do
[
map.x + map.y,
map.y + map.x,
map.x + map.y,
map.y + map.x,
map.x + map.y,
map.y + map.x,
]
end
def annotated(%{} = map) do
[
map.x + map.y,
map.y + map.x,
map.x + map.y,
map.y + map.x,
map.x + map.y,
map.y + map.x,
]
end
def match(%{x: x, y: y}) do
[
x + y,
y + x,
x + y,
y + x,
x + y,
y + x,
]
end
defmacrop dot(map, key) do
quote do
:erlang.map_get(unquote(key), unquote(map))
end
end
def safe_dot(map) do
[
dot(map, :x) + dot(map, :y),
dot(map, :y) + dot(map, :x),
dot(map, :x) + dot(map, :y),
dot(map, :y) + dot(map, :x),
dot(map, :x) + dot(map, :y),
dot(map, :y) + dot(map, :x),
]
end
defmacrop match(map, field) do
quote do
%{unquote(field) => value} = unquote(map)
value
end
end
def match_every_time(map) do
[
match(map, :x) + match(map, :y),
match(map, :y) + match(map, :x),
match(map, :x) + match(map, :y),
match(map, :y) + match(map, :x),
match(map, :x) + match(map, :y),
match(map, :y) + match(map, :x),
]
end
end
Benchee.run(%{
"dot" => fn -> X.dot(%{x: 1, y: 1}) end,
"annotated" => fn -> X.annotated(%{x: 1, y: 1}) end,
"erlang.map_get" => fn -> X.safe_dot(%{x: 1, y: 1}) end,
"match" => fn -> X.match(%{x: 1, y: 1}) end,
"match_every_time" => fn -> X.match_every_time(%{x: 1, y: 1}) end,
}, warmup: 1, time: 2)
And the result is:
Name ips average deviation median 99th %
match 7.46 M 133.99 ns ±22658.59% 90 ns 184 ns
match_every_time 7.33 M 136.44 ns ±23751.72% 93 ns 181 ns
annotated 7.22 M 138.59 ns ±23522.99% 92 ns 196 ns
erlang.map_get 6.67 M 149.82 ns ±21303.83% 105 ns 212 ns
dot 4.24 M 235.62 ns ±16830.96% 137 ns 266 ns
Comparison:
match 7.46 M
match_every_time 7.33 M - 1.02x slower +2.45 ns
annotated 7.22 M - 1.03x slower +4.60 ns
erlang.map_get 6.67 M - 1.12x slower +15.83 ns
dot 4.24 M - 1.76x slower +101.63 ns
Explanation
First of all, construction like map.field get’s compiled into this by elixir compiler. This is a feature of Elixir runtime and it is caused by feature of calling functions without (). However, code map.field() gets compiled to the same expression.
case map do
module when is_atom(module) -> apply(module, :field, [])
%{field: value} -> value
_ -> raise BadMapError
end
matchgenerates the fastest core_erlang and beam for this problem. Rule of thumb: pattern matching is always the fastest way to access the data in collections in both Erlang and Elixir.annotatedgenerates almost the same core_erlang asdotversion, but compiler sees that themapvariable in the function body will always be a map (otherwise it wouldn’t pass the matching in args) and it optimizes thecasegenerated bydotto just a pattern matching. So it generates the same BEAM asmatchversionerlang.map_getis a very unpopular way to access the key of a map, and it is the third way to do so, added in one of the latest OTP version. It is actually a separate BIF and it is slower because it performs a map type check on every calldotis the slowest one, because it performs a type check and a jump on every key access
Conclusions
- Annotate your maps to have better performance of
., or at least try to express as much code in pattern matching as possible - Rewrite nested access like
map.submap.subsubmap.fieldinto pattern-matching, or at least use Pathex. - Use Tria optimizing compiler which performs analysis to simplify the
casegenerated by., thus extracting the best performance for the.expression.
Trending in Discussions
As the title says, please share what you’ve been up to with Elixir. Whether that’s been learning it, looking into it, making stuff with i...
New
I want to open this thread for you all to discuss and help those who really like Ash but are still hesitant to use it in a real project. ...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
I’m posting this in response to Jose’s recent tweet (Cr. link) :
People are sleeping on Elixir for a coding harness:
Hot-code swappi...
New
Hello,
I wrote Stop My Hand, a Scattergories-like web application using Phoenix/LiveView as my learning project for Elixir (after readin...
New
AcmeScript — Writing JS hooks as if I were still using Elixir
I’ve been having fun building a little something over the last few days: Ac...
New
It would be helpful to have a list of companies worldwide that hire engineers without prior experience in Elixir. Often, it can be quite ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
There are three potential reasons for members of this forum to have a look at https://vutuv.de
You are tired or annoyed of LinkedIn.
Yo...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
lud
You are extracting the values only once here.
D4no0
Indeed the 2x performance penalty is just too much, it doesn’t make any sense.
hst337
No, that’s not the reason. The evaluation of extracting the field is pure, so compiler performs optimization in every case (except dot) that extract the data only once. However, some of them perform additional checks upon every call. This is what this benchmark shows.
I’ve updated the benchmark to reflect in-place matching.
cc @D4no0
lud
Interesting, thank you.
The compiler could optimize that as well though. Are you certain it doesn’t ?
I wonder why in my first benchmarck the match head was consistently slower then.
hst337
If you specify functions not in the body of a module, they’re interpreted as
erl_evalstructures. And this is not suitable for benchmarkinglud
Ok but in my second benchmark they were defined with
defin a module.sodapopcan
@hst337 Super interesting, thank you for this.
Does Tria’s
.implementation sacrifice any features of Elixir’s? IE, could Elixir not also make this optimization? Perhaps you’ve talked about this before in the forums and I missed it (I generally follow those threads silently as they are a bit out of my wheelhouse).Overall this doesn’t dissuade me from using
.when I feel it reads better, but I will think now twice in situations where I favour.in a readability coin toss.D4no0
I think this is an anti-pattern, you should use whatever makes the code readable and maintainable and not dwelve into these low-stake optimizations, as they are negligible in the big picture. Hardware becomes more powerful and cheaper by the minute and your time not.
If the optimization was not already implemented in elixir, means that there is some reason for that or it will be implemented in the future.
sodapopcan
I agree 100%, I just meant I will use this knowledge to now favour pattern matching in situations where I could go either way. I don’t generally favour one over the other, it’s always situational. Every once in a while I find myself not caring which I use, so why not use performance as a tie-breaker, no matter how small it may be.
I figured, but I’m still interested to know what it is!
hst337
Nah, it is not going to be implemented in the future, because it is just too much work for Elixir team. I’ve implemented it, but my implementation has insignificant limitations like slightly slower runtime recompilation. My ideas won’t become a part of the language any time soon. Core team of Elixir is interested in static typing, while core team of Erlang is interested in their own customers, who are in this 0.1% of users, who actually use hot-reloading in production
There was no reason in introducing this kind of syntax in the first place. Calls without parentheses could be implemented without this kind of performance drawback, like constructs where the left argument of
.is not a compile-time atom and there are no parentheses or args, could always be treated as:erlang.map_get.So this is a language design issue, and, to be honest, it is not very much of an important issue. I wrote a compiler which is able to overcome it, and simple annotation restores the performance back to 100%. Other languages have UBs, untrackable exceptions and forkbombs in 7 chars, so creators of Elixir did a good job there.
No, Moore’s law stoped working a while ago, and maximum number of cores in one CPU, and maximum number of CPU’s in one motherboard have their limits. We either optimize our code, or hope for the best in terms of quantum computing