RicoTrevisan
Thinking out loud so that you can give me feedback if I got this correct.
I can use Scope both to make sure that the calls I’m making are properly scope and I can use it to have a few handy things at hand on each different LiveView.
So, if I take the example from the docs.
defmodule MyApp.Scope do
defstruct [:current_user, :current_tenant, :locale]
defimpl Ash.Scope.ToOpts do
def get_actor(%{current_user: current_user}), do: {:ok, current_user}
def get_tenant(%{current_tenant: current_tenant}), do: {:ok, current_tenant}
def get_context(%{locale: locale}), do: {:ok, %{shared: %{locale: locale}}}
# You typically configure tracers in config files
# so this will typically return :error
def get_tracer(_), do: :error
# This should likely always return :error
# unless you want a way to bypass authorization configured in your scope
def get_authorize?(_), do: :error
end
end
current_user and current_tenant should be the :id , correct? Everything else I want to “carry with me” I should put in the :context.
I’m asking this because I initially started putting together a project and I thought it would be best to put the whole %User{} and the %Tenant{} so that I can access it all easily, but I’m not sure that’s what the rest of the community is doing.
So, if I want to have the tenant_slug with me at all times, I should modify the above example like:
defmodule MyApp.Scope do
defstruct [:current_user, :current_tenant, :locale, :slug]
defimpl Ash.Scope.ToOpts do
def get_actor(%{current_user: current_user}), do: {:ok, current_user}
def get_tenant(%{current_tenant: current_tenant}), do: {:ok, current_tenant}
def get_context(%{locale: locale, slug: slug}) do
{:ok, %{shared: %{locale: locale, slug: slug}}}
end
def get_tracer(_), do: :error
def get_authorize?(_), do: :error
end
end
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
franckstifler
current_userandcurrent_tenantare the stucts representing the actor and the tenant which should be applied.for the tenant, you can implement the protocol
Ash.ToTenantthat would transform the tenant to what is needed (id in case of attribute multitenancy, or schema name in case of schema multintenancy)franckstifler
I think for the tenant_slug you aredoing fine, as with the locale.
What is the use of the slug in your context? I would have taken it in tenant struct (tenant.slug) everywhere I need to use it.
But if you’re using a schema based multitenancy, just implemented the Ash.ToTenant protocol and return the slug in
to_tenant/2RicoTrevisan
Thanks! I’m going to give this a try.
I’ll set the scope with the %User{} and %Org{} instead of just the id to reference them. That way I can get rid of the slug – the %Org{} already has the slug inside of it. (I use the slug for navigation
/orgs/{slug}/stuff)