kai_feldhoff

kai_feldhoff

In my current project I have a rather complex data-tranfsformation. Additionally there are several flavors fo ths trqansormation that share a lot of behaviour.

Is therea any other may to call a callback-function inside a bahaviour apart from passing the module-name of the callback-module like this?

defmodule MyBehaviour do
  @callback specific_handling(data :: term) :: term

  @callback very_specific_handling(data :: term) :: term

  defmacro __using__(_opts) do
    quote do
      @behaviour MyBehaviour

      alias MyBehaviour

      def initiate_processing(data) do
        MyBehaviour.process_data(data, __MODULE__)
      end
    end
  end

  def process_data(data, callback_module) do
    data
    |> do_stuff_with_data(callback_module)
    # and other calls to behaviour-functions
    |> callback_module.specific_handling()
  end

  defp do_stuff_with_data(data, callback_module) do
    data
    # and other calls to behaviour-functions
    |> do_specific_stuff(callback_module)
  end

  defp do_specific_stuff(data, callback_module) do
    data
    # and other calls to behaviour-functions
    |> callback_module.very_specific_handling()
  end
end

defmodule DataHandler11 do
  use MyBehaviour

  def specific_handling(data) do
    # do specific stuff with data
    data
  end

  def very_specific_handling(data) do
    # do specific stuff with data
    data
  end
end

defmodule DataHandler12 do
  use MyBehaviour

  def specific_handling(data) do
    # do specific stuff with data
    data
  end

  def very_specific_handling(data) do
    # do specific stuff with data
    data
  end
end

data = nil
handler = 1

case handler do
  1 -> DataHandler11.initiate_processing(data)
  2 -> DataHandler12.initiate_processing(data)
end

Showing Posts 1 to 4

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

That’s exactly how callback modules are meant to be used. Provide them to generalized code and let that generalized code call into function on the callback module where needed.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

I would give you a thumbs up during code review on a PR like this – it’s all good.

If you are worried about this approach then the only other practice that’s more “micro” would be to only pass function references – but then you would be losing the compiler warnings if a contract is violated i.e. if the function has the same arity but accepts different kinds of arguments.

So IMO callback modules are the right solution here.

kai_feldhoff

kai_feldhoff OP

Thank you two for your quick feedback!

This convinces me to keep this track.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Another option would be to generate all the required code into the module that says use. This replaces threading callback_module everywhere by local calls:

defmodule MyBehaviour do
  @callback specific_handling(data :: term) :: term

  @callback very_specific_handling(data :: term) :: term

  defmacro __using__(_opts) do
    quote do
      @behaviour MyBehaviour

      alias MyBehaviour

      def initiate_processing(data) do
        data
        |> do_stuff_with_data()
        # and other calls to behaviour-functions
        |> specific_handling()
      end

      defp do_stuff_with_data(data) do
        data
        # and other calls to behaviour-functions
        |> do_specific_stuff()
      end

      defp do_specific_stuff(data) do
        data
        # and other calls to behaviour-functions
        |> very_specific_handling()
      end
    end
  end
end

defmodule DataHandler11 do
  use MyBehaviour

  def specific_handling(data) do
    # do specific stuff with data
    data
  end

  def very_specific_handling(data) do
    # do specific stuff with data
    data
  end
end

defmodule DataHandler12 do
  use MyBehaviour

  def specific_handling(data) do
    # do specific stuff with data
    data
  end

  def very_specific_handling(data) do
    # do specific stuff with data
    data
  end
end

data = nil
handler = 1

case handler do
  1 -> DataHandler11.initiate_processing(data)
  2 -> DataHandler12.initiate_processing(data)
end

This has a cost: the code output by __using__ is compiled over again for every module that calls it, versus only being compiled once when MyBehaviour is compiled.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews