roflbobl
I run a system, where some structs are saved as binary with :erlang.term_to_binary and then deserialized with :erlang.binary_to_term. The problem is, that if I alter the struct, it does not match the saved binary, and it will then not be deserialized correctly.
I have a test where i add a key, after saving some data, and of course, the deserialized data is missing that key. Is was hoping it will just give the new key the value nil.
Has anyone solved this problem?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #ai
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
NobbZ
Do not serialize the struct, but just the map without the
__struct__key.Roughly:
For the deserializing something like the following should do:
This should work, as drafted in the following iex session:
On top of that though, I suggest to finally stabilize the struct quickly. Or to version your data format and use explicit conversion or “upcasters”.
roflbobl
ye, I will probably end up with explicit conversion. I was just hoping I did not need to rewrite that part of the system as it is quite large…
dimitarvp
The part that serializes and deserializes structs is large? Why so? Can’t you just insert
Map.from_structin two places as @NobbZ recommended, and be done with it?al2o3cr
If you’re storing long-lived term data (versus caching, etc where old versions can be discarded) here are two approaches that can help:
versionfield to the struct with a default value. Bump it every time you add/remove fields. The code that saysbinary_to_termwill need to checkversionand handle converting the old shape into the new shapeIMO the motivation to pick one versus the other is how often “old” data is read; if it’s used constantly then updating it once in a batch will be faster (the first approach) - but if it’s mostly historical and only read occasionally then doing it on-demand (the second approach) will avoid doing computations that might never be used.
gregvaughn
You could probably even get fancy and use the built-in
@vsnModule attribute