roflbobl

roflbobl

I run a system, where some structs are saved as binary with :erlang.term_to_binary and then deserialized with :erlang.binary_to_term. The problem is, that if I alter the struct, it does not match the saved binary, and it will then not be deserialized correctly.

I have a test where i add a key, after saving some data, and of course, the deserialized data is missing that key. Is was hoping it will just give the new key the value nil.

Has anyone solved this problem?

Showing Posts 1 to 5

NobbZ

NobbZ

Do not serialize the struct, but just the map without the __struct__ key.

Roughly:

data
|> Map.from_struct()
|> :erlang.term_to_binary()

For the deserializing something like the following should do:

binary
|> :erlang.binary_to_term()
|> then(&struct(YourStruct, &1))

This should work, as drafted in the following iex session:

iex(1)> defmodule S do defstruct ~w[a b c d e f g]a end
iex(2)> struct(S, %{a: 1})
%S{a: 1, b: nil, c: nil, d: nil, e: nil, f: nil, g: nil}

On top of that though, I suggest to finally stabilize the struct quickly. Or to version your data format and use explicit conversion or “upcasters”.

roflbobl

roflbobl OP

ye, I will probably end up with explicit conversion. I was just hoping I did not need to rewrite that part of the system as it is quite large…

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

The part that serializes and deserializes structs is large? Why so? Can’t you just insert Map.from_struct in two places as @NobbZ recommended, and be done with it?

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

If you’re storing long-lived term data (versus caching, etc where old versions can be discarded) here are two approaches that can help:

  • explicit migration when changing the underlying struct. You’d write a one-off task to load each term, adjust its structure, then save it back
  • explicit versioning in the data. Add a version field to the struct with a default value. Bump it every time you add/remove fields. The code that says binary_to_term will need to check version and handle converting the old shape into the new shape

IMO the motivation to pick one versus the other is how often “old” data is read; if it’s used constantly then updating it once in a batch will be faster (the first approach) - but if it’s mostly historical and only read occasionally then doing it on-demand (the second approach) will avoid doing computations that might never be used.

gregvaughn

gregvaughn

You could probably even get fancy and use the built-in @vsn Module attribute

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews