shosti

shosti

I have a socket/channel setup with some custom authentication logic. If the authentication fails, it shows an error message to the user (so they can fix the problem). Right now this is handled at the channel level–basically all socket connections are accepted, but only properly authenticated sockets can join particular channels.

I’d prefer to move auth checking to the socket level, so unauthenticated connections get refused with a 403 (that would prevent accidental and/or malicious unauthed connections from holding unnecessary socket connections). The problem I’m running into: socket authentication failures seem to be handled the same way as “normal” connection failures by the client (triggering onClose and onError with generic close events, starting retries, etc.).

So my question: is there any way to have custom handling for socket authentication errors on the client side? I’d like “normal” connection failures to use the default behavior (retries, etc.) but authentication failures to not retry and instead alert the user. Thanks in advance!

Showing Posts 1 to 10

Stingray

Stingray

The same issue. Any ideas?

josevalim

josevalim

Creator of Elixir

If I remember correctly, it is not possible to do so because browsers do not provide enough information to the client in a way we can inform what went wrong, unfortunately. :frowning:

Kabie

Kabie

With websocket, I think we actually can put something here, in the 403 body:
https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/5d90892e32cae195b8235fb921666cd016fef111/lib/phoenix/transports/websocket.ex#L86

Not sure how LongPoll should handle this though.

It seems that browser does not have the access to the websocket request and response. Can we allow a case {:error, reason} here, only for a non-browser client (which is my case).

chrismccord

chrismccord

Creator of Phoenix

As far as I’m aware, the browser WebSocket clients have no way to access the body of the handshake response, so this wouldn’t help us.

Kabie

Kabie

Yes, I understand that. However, clients other than a browser may have access to that, which is my case.

I can write a Transport replacing Phoenix.Transports.WebSocket, but I can only returns {:ok, socket} or :error in connect:

https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/5d90892e32cae195b8235fb921666cd016fef111/lib/phoenix/socket/transport.ex#L179

I’m asking can we allow a {:error, reason} case here, so a Transport can leverage that.

GregMefford

GregMefford

I was unwilling to accept that this is impossible, so I’ve come up with the following hack that works to resolve the issue of a Phoenix Socket that has an expired authentication token, causing it to return a 403 when the client tries to reconnect. This happens, for example, when the user has left a page open for hours on end, so the token is expired, but the Phoenix Channel client is still trying to reconnect and the page itself is still loaded in the browser, so it has no idea that its token is expired.

Each time it tries and fails to connect, it generates an event that can be captured with a socket.onError callback. The problem is that this event doesn’t have any useful information in it about why the connection failed. We can see that the reason is because the connection 403ed in the Chrome dev tools, but JavaScript can’t see that error message. The hack is to have a callback that makes an AJAX call to the server, being sure to send credential cookies like you normally would, and check whether it gets redirected to your login page. This obviously assumes that the AJAX call you make would get redirected if you’re not logged in, and would not get redirected if you’re already logged in.

In this case, I’m just reloading the page when I detect this condition (which will cause me to get redirected to login again), but you could do whatever you need to do in JavaScript-land.

Pardon my terrible JavaScript; hopefully you can find the meaning beneath the madness.

const reloadOnRedirect = () => {
  fetch('/', {credentials: 'same-origin'})
    .then((response) => { if (response.redirected) window.location.reload() });
}

// Normal Socket setup code ...

socket.onError(reloadOnRedirect);
socket.connect
OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

I so love when someone says that. ^.^

norpan

norpan

I’m battling with the same problem. My solution is to not have authentication on the socket connection, but move it to the channels. Specifically to the “general” channel. If there is no authentication information, the channel will send an “unauthorized” response, which will trigger the login process again.

paulstatezny

paulstatezny

I’ve ran into the same exact problem.

Since JWT tokens can be inspected / the data pulled out, I’m going to check my refresh token’s exp claim to determine if it’s expired. (Probably with a clock drift tolerance; meaning if it expires in the next ~30 seconds I count it as expired.)

Then I’ll add an onError or onClose handler that:

  1. Checks if our current token is expired.
  2. If so, refreshes and then re-creates the Socket object with the new credentials in the params.
  3. If not, just no-ops.

Slightly inefficient / hacky feeling, but it should work. I’ll report back with the results.

OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

JWT tokens are generally supposed to have a very short life, like 30 seconds to a minute max is usual, anything longer is almost certainly a misdesign as it makes it easier to reuse, so be careful with it.

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews