santoshbt
Hi All,
I am using Cloak 0.6.2 version. It was working all good. I upgraded the Elixir version to Elixir 1.13.0, Phoenix - 1.5.9 and phoenix_pubsub : 2.0.
After upgrading, I am getting the following error
- (exit) an exception was raised:
** (UndefinedFunctionError) function Cloak.EncryptedBinaryField.equal?/2 is undefined or private
(cloak 0.6.2) Cloak.EncryptedBinaryField.equal?(nil, “Basement Flat, 2 Barons Court Road”)
(ecto 3.7.2) lib/ecto/changeset.ex:576: Ecto.Changeset.cast_field/8
I am passing the changeset in this way
struct
|> cast(
upcase(params, [:current_address_postcode]),
~w[
current_address_street current_address_locality current_address_county
current_address_postcode current_address_udprn
]a
)
It was working all good previously, now it is throwing error.
Any help to fix this, would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Santosh T
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #performance











Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
That version of Cloak is too outdated to work with the current version of Ecto - the semantics of
Ecto.Typechanged to require thatequals?function in Add use Ecto.Type · elixir-ecto/ecto@c040b7c · GitHubThis issue suggests you’ll want to upgrade to at least Cloak 1.1.0:
santoshbt
Thanks for the reply. I can update the version, but should we have to migrate the old existing encrypted data as well? Will it have a huge impact? Bit concerned about the Production data.
stefanchrobot
I don’t think you need any data migration. An encrypted value has all the details of the cipher that was used for encryption.
santoshbt
I have upgraded to cloak_ecto, it is failing to load the previous data.
** (ArgumentError) cannot load
<<65, 69, 83, 1, 225, 62, 249, 49, 101, 202, 45, 28, 221, 3, 238, 254, 112, 32, 115, 255, 128, 10, 119, 251, 104, 191, 116, 53, 199, 229, 23, 108, 129, 178>>as type MyApp.Encrypted.Binary for field :phone_number in %MyApp.Profile{meta: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, “profiles”>,Data migration is also not possible.
stefanchrobot
What is the previous and the current version? Can you share your Cloak config (skipping the encryption key, obviously)?
santoshbt
Previously it was Cloak 0.6.2. I upgraded to cloak_ecto 1.0
previously
config :cloak, Cloak.AES.CTR,
tag: “AES”,
default: true,
keys: [
]
After update
config :m
I will try with key: :base64.decode(cloak_key_1) for now in upgraded
stefanchrobot
Can you also please check the previous and current version of
cloak? You should be able to see it in themix.lockfile.Just to make sure: previously were you using
cloakdirectly or viacloak_ecto?santoshbt
I was using cloak directly. Higher versions of cloak advises to use cloak_ecto
stefanchrobot
Sorry for giving you a confusing advice. Since you’re updating from a pretty old version of Cloak, I think you should follow the upgrade guide and perform each minor version upgrade step by step, that is upgrade 0.6 to 0.7, 0.7 to. 0.8, etc. until you migrate to the latest one.
As you can see in the guide, this indeed will require a data migration.
al2o3cr
Like @stefanchrobot suggests, you’ll need to upgrade
cloakincrementally to catch up. You’ll also need to do this before changing your Ecto etc version, as vintagecloaks are not compatible with current Ecto.