ausimian

ausimian

Code Coverage for Umbrella Projects in GitLab

I spent a bit of time looking at getting code-coverage metrics and reporting working for an umbrella project in a self-hosted GitLab instance (15.3). There were a few things I tried along the way and I’m posting it here in the hope that it might save others a little bit of time in the future. Also I don’t have a blog, and no interest in maintaining one, so this will be my own aide memoir.

Regarding GitLab, there appear to be basically two different aspects of support for code-coverage. First, a single metric providing a % measure of total code-coverage which is used in a number of places:

  • On pipelines, i.e. what is the coverage of a particular build
  • On merge requests, which also tells us the delta vs the current coverage of the default branch, typically main
  • As a charted time-series value in ‘Analytics’
  • As a value you can stick on a badge, also taken from the default branch

The second, is a more detailed view, allowing you to visualise the actual changes to coverage in individual files within an existing merge request (discussed in more detail here).

With that out of the way, here’s what I landed on:

Run all the tests with coverage

In the .gitlab-ci.yml:

script:
  - MIX_ENV=test mix test --cover export-coverage default

Note, I didn’t need to add any test_coverage: configuration to any of the mix projects, nor the root one.

Calculate the total test coverage

This is what will be used for pipelines, stats and badges.

after_script:
  # Generate test coverage metric
  - MIX_ENV=test mix test.coverage || true
...
coverage:
  - '/    Coverage:   \d+.\d+%/'

Generate Cobertura files

In order to present coverage in merge requests, GitLab requires that coverage reports in Cobertura format be available. Generating a single coverage file from all umbrella applications was achieved using covertool.

In the root mix.exs, add the following dependency:

def deps do
  [
    {:covertool, "~> 2.0.4", only: :test, runtime: false, app: false, compile: "rebar3 escriptize"}
  ]
end

Then, in the after_script: section of the .gitlab-ci.yml, have covertool build a single coverage.xml file from the raw coverage data generated during the test run, first by using cover to combine the individual coverage files into one, and then using covertool to convert that into cobertura format. In the example below, there are 3 projects in the umbrella, imaginatively named :proj_a, :proj_b and :proj_c.

after_script:
  # Generate test coverage metric
  - MIX_ENV=test mix test.coverage || true
  # Build a single coverage file, all.coverdata
  - elixir 
    -e "Enum.each(~w(proj_a proj_b proj_c), fn app -> :cover.import(~c(./apps/#{app}/cover/default.coverdata)) end)"
    -e ":cover.export(~c(./all.coverdata))"
  # Convert it to cobertura format in a single coverage.xml file
  - ./deps/covertool/_build/default/bin/covertool
    -cover all.coverdata
    -output coverage.xml
    -ebin _build/test/lib/proj_a/ebin,_build/test/lib/proj_b/ebin,_build/test/lib/proj_c/ebin
  # Fix up the paths in the resulting file
  - sed -i "/\/builds\/umbrella\///g" coverage.xml

The final step fixes up the paths in the coverage.xml file so the <filename> elements contain the same path that GitLab uses in the merge requests. In the above example this has the affect of changing
<filename>/builds/umbrella/apps/...</filename to <filename>apps/...</filename.

Upload the coverage report

artifacts:
  reports:
    coverage_report:
      coverage_format: cobertura
      path: coverage.xml

A final note - in the above examples I’ve used multiline yaml in some of the commands to improve the formatting, but in my own system it’s not been written and tested that way so you might need to tweak it a bit.

Where Next?

Popular in Discussions Top

pillaiindu
In django there is a cache framework backed by memcached. Rails also puts a lot of emphasis on caching, and even the idea of russian-doll...
New
rms.mrcs
A couple of days ago I was discussing with a friend about different approaches to write microservices. He said that if he was going to w...
New
Nvim
Anybody knows a comprehensive comparison of Django and Phoenix, thanks for the help. Where are they similar? Where do they differ the m...
New
Nvim
Elixir appears to be a superior language to Python. I don’t see any advantage of Python over Elixir. Are there any?
New
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Background A few days ago I was listening to The future of Elixir from Elixir Talks, with Dave Thomas (@pragdave ) and Brian Mitchell. I...
New
thojanssens1
It would be nice to be able to define a redirect from one route to another from the router.ex file. E.g.: redirect "/", UserController, ...
New
cvkmohan
The upcoming Phoenix 1.6 release looks very interesting. Became a habit to watch the commits - and - what they are bringing in. phx.gen...
New

Other popular topics Top

jononomo
I am trying to figure out how Mix knows whether the environment is test, dev, or prod – where is this set? Thanks.
New
chrismccord
Phoenix 1.4.0 released Phoenix 1.4 is out! This release ships with exciting new features, most notably with HTTP2 support, improved deve...
688 31525 112
New
sen
Hi All, I set a environment variables in dev.exs , like below code. when i start server, how can i set the ${enable} value? thanks. d...
New
AstonJ
Seen any cool LiveView demos, sample apps or examples? Please post them here! :003:
New
bsollish-terakeet
Credo is smart enough to check for (something like) this: assert length(the_list) == 0 with this response: Checking if an enum is empt...
New
jason.o
In the code below, if the create action is not set to accept “extra_key” as an input, it errors out with a message shown above. Is there ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement