leifericf
Code snippets to compare Erlang and Elixir syntax
Hello, friends!
Context:
As you might know from this thread, I’m working on a presentation.
Following a tour of Erlang history, I have a slide which reads:
“If Erlang is so great, then why should I bother with Elixir?”
On the following slide, I mention that Erlang has a somewhat alien syntax, since it was influenced by Prolog and Smalltalk. New programmers can find that scary and off-putting.
I go on to mention that one of the reasons to choose Elixir is that the syntax is more modern, familiar and user-friendly than its big brother, Erlang. I mention that is feels kind of Ruby-esque. Of course, I also point out that Elixir only looks like Ruby on the surface and that it is fundamentally different.
Problem:
In order to make this comparison more immediate, I would like to show some semantically equivalent code-snippets from Erlang and Elixir, side-by-side. They need to be short enough to fit on one slide.
Some of the attendees have never seen Erlang or Elixir code before. I have not shown any code examples up until this point in the presentation, as it is very high-level.
I’m struggling to come up with some good examples that show off the differences between Erlang and Elixir. Preferably, it would highlight some unique features as well, e.g. pattern matching.
Question:
Could I ask for your help? If you wanted to illustrate the syntactical differences between Erlang and Elixir, what do you think would be some good (and terse) examples?
I will also refer to this forum thread in my presentation, so attendees can see more examples.
Marked As Solved
leifericf
After a few hours of Googling, I discover that we have this page on the official website ![]()
That’s pretty much exactly what I was looking for.
But if you have any other examples, I would gladly take those as well!
Also Liked
leifericf
gregvaughn
I’m not sure how much Smalltalk influence there is in the syntax. Prolog is the main influence I’ve heard about.
One other thing that might fit on the slide is to have a second clause for some_fun/1. In Erlang you’ll need to separate the clauses with a semi-colon, but Elixir has no explicit syntax for that.
NobbZ
This slide does not only compare syntax. It also swaps out functions from the stdlibs.
Additionally you use atoms (single quotes) on the erlang slide, where you should use strings (double quotes).
And IO.inspect is more like using ~p in :io.format, as ~s will fail with badarg when given a tuple, while IO.inspect will happily print it out. Also a noteworthy difference is, that :io.format returns :ok, IO.inspect returns the inspected value.
Popular in Questions
Other popular topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #javascript
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #elixirconf-us
- #distillery
- #processes
- #forms
- #api
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #performance









