windexoriginal

windexoriginal

Collectable for error tuple, a good idea?

I often find myself with code like this when applying a function that returns error tuples to an enumerable:

is_ok? = fn x -> 
  if x < 5, do: {:ok, x}, else: {:error, "too big"} 
end

Enum.reduce_while(1..5, {:ok, []}, fn v, {:ok, vs} ->
 case is_ok?.(v) do
  {:ok, v} -> {:cont, {:ok, [v | vs]}}
  {:error, _} = e -> {:halt, e}
 end
end)

But, if I write a simple collectable implementation for Tuple, I can write this instead:

for x < - 1..5, into: {:ok, []}, do: is_ok.(x)

I much prefer the second: it’s short, it’s clear, and I don’t mind too much that it iterates the whole enumerable every time. Is implementing a protocol for convenience on a built in type like this a good long term decision?

First Post!

Asd

Asd

If you implement collectable and you do

for x < - 1..1000000, into: {:ok, []}, do: is_ok.(x)

You will perform 999995 unnecessary operations

Most Liked

FlyingNoodle

FlyingNoodle

I much, much prefer the first version. I can immediately see what happens and understand.

I always prefer clarity over brevity. Always. Every. Single. Time.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

My reading was that the Collectable implementation would check the shape of the block’s return value:

  • if it’s {:ok, value} and the accumulator is {:ok, values} then the new accumulator is {:ok, values ++ [value]} (or equivalent with reverse-at-the-end for performance)
  • if it’s {:ok, value} and the accumulator is anything else then the new accumulator is unchanged
  • if it’s {:error, e} then the new accumulator is {:error, e}

I don’t think I’d personally choose this approach, since it requires defining Collectable for all tuples but only actually cares about specific shapes

Last Post!

dmitrykleymenov

dmitrykleymenov

Yeah, doesn’t seem like Collectable any more, significantly different from other implementations.

Where Next?

Popular in Questions Top

minhajuddin
I have seen a lot of code which picks the first element from a list using Enum.at(0) instead of List.first. Is there a reason why people ...
New
lessless
I believe there are people here who are dealing with CSV files import on the daily basis, and since Excel is a really popular tool there ...
New
PeterCarter
There are pre-rolled solutions for other frameworks that do work. However, Phoenix does not seem to have these. Have people had good expe...
New
bsollish-terakeet
Credo is smart enough to check for (something like) this: assert length(the_list) == 0 with this response: Checking if an enum is empt...
New
shijith.k
I am trying to start a new phoenix project with elixir 1.9, but mix phx.new does not work. It says that ** (Mix) The task "phx.new" could...
New
siddhant3030
Hi, I have to write a raw query for one of my project. But till now I have used ecto queries and don’t have much experience writing raw ...
New
fayddelight
I tried installing elixir 1.11.2 erlang 23.3.4 via asdf in my zsh shell. Enabled the versions locally and globally. When I list them ...
New

Other popular topics Top

nobody
Hi! In PHP: $_SERVER[‘SERVER_ADDR’] - in Elixir? Searched the docs for ip address and the web, no good results. Thanks!
New
chrismccord
Phoenix 1.4.0 released Phoenix 1.4 is out! This release ships with exciting new features, most notably with HTTP2 support, improved deve...
688 31586 112
New
AngeloChecked
What learn first? Rust or Elixir Hi Elixir community! I’m here because i want learn a new language. I’m a junior developer and mainly i ...
New
Patoshizzle
After calling mix ecto.create I get this error: 17:00:32.162 [error] GenServer #PID&lt;0.412.0&gt; terminating ** (Postgrex.Error) FATAL...
New
Harrisonl
We have an ECS cluster with 4 services, where each task joins a single cluster, via discovery ECS discovery service. Currently when I de...
New
AstonJ
Posting this to see if we can make things easier for people to get into Neovim. If you use Neovim and have a favourite distro please let ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement