joelpaulkoch

joelpaulkoch

Hey, I know compiling with EMLX is unstable at the moment.
Is there already a plan how to make the compiler work?

I still tried to compile smollm2 with EMLX and got left with some questions.

Here a script for reproduction. I’m running this on an M2 mac.

Mix.install([
  {:bumblebee, "~> 0.6.0"},
  {:nx, "~> 0.9.0"},
  {:emlx, github: "elixir-nx/emlx"}
])

backend = {EMLX.Backend, device: :gpu}
compiler = Nx.Defn.Evaluator

Nx.global_default_backend(backend)

repo = {:hf, "HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct"}

{:ok, model_info} = Bumblebee.load_model(repo)
{:ok, tokenizer} = Bumblebee.load_tokenizer(repo)
{:ok, generation_config} = Bumblebee.load_generation_config(repo)

generation_config =
  Bumblebee.configure(generation_config,
    max_new_tokens: 256,
    strategy: %{type: :multinomial_sampling, top_p: 0.6}
  )

serving =
  Bumblebee.Text.generation(model_info, tokenizer, generation_config,
    compile: [batch_size: 1, sequence_length: 512],
    stream: false,
    defn_options: [compiler: compiler]
  )

{:ok, _pid} =
  Supervisor.start_link([{Nx.Serving, name: Serving, serving: serving}], strategy: :one_for_one)

prompt = """
<|im_start|>user
Tell me a joke<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
"""

Nx.Serving.run(serving, prompt) |> dbg
Nx.Serving.batched_run(Serving, prompt) |> dbg

1. Not compiling

When I don’t set the compile option, everything just works as compilation is disabled (just an observation, no question here).

serving =
  Bumblebee.Text.generation(model_info, tokenizer, generation_config,
-   compile: [batch_size: 1, sequence_length: 512],
    stream: false,
    defn_options: [compiler: compiler]
  )

2. Compiling with Nx.Defn.Evaluator

When I set the compile option, the compilation with Nx.Defn.Evaluator gets stuck, similar to what’s described in Basic Bumblee text embedding run seemingly stalling and Bumblebee: Slow load_model in GenServer, slow Nx.Serving.run in exs file .
Nx.Serving.run finishes, but Nx.Serving.batched_run doesn’t.

I digged deeper and found that this is the place where it gets stuck in Nx.Serving:

      wrapped_function = fn ->
        :telemetry.span([:nx, :serving, :execute], %{module: module}, fn ->
          if hooks_table do
            :ets.insert(hooks_table, {partition, ref_sizes})
          end

          {output, metadata} = function.()

          for {[ref | pids], start, size} <- ref_sizes do
            send(ref, {ref, {:batch, {start, size, output, metadata}}})

            for pid <- pids do
              send(pid, {ref, size})
            end
          end

          {:done, %{metadata: metadata, module: module}}
        end)
      end

+     :persistent_term.put(:fun, wrapped_function)
+
+     task = Task.Supervisor.async_nolink(state.task_supervisor, fn -> fun = :persistent_term.get(:fun); fun.() end)
-     task = Task.Supervisor.async_nolink(state.task_supervisor, wrapped_function)

Looks to me like the call to Task.Supervisor.async_nolink/2 never returns.

I actually ran into a similar issue when using the EMLX compiler in nif_call, I will talk about that below.
There, I found a solution which I applied here again: putting wrapped_function into persistent_term and reading it back from there inside the task.

So, this actually works.
I just have no clue why it’s not working in the original version.

I first noticed that the size of wrapped_function is large when using Nx.Defn.Evaluator compared to what EXLA is producing (size retrieved using :erts_debug.size/1: 431971 vs. 31294).
That’s why I tried storing and reading from persistent_term in the first place.
However, I can run closures of similar size as task in iex, and after all it doesn’t seem huge to me.
According to my calculations, that should be around 3.5 MB.

So, if the size is not the problem, why is this not working in the original version, but working when using persistent_term?

3. Compiling with EMLX

When using the EMLX compiler I ran into a similar issue: in nif_call, it gets stuck at passing the callback function when trying to register the function, here a GenServer.call never returns.
Here, I found the solution with persistent_term.

in lib/emlx.ex

  callback = fn args ->
    args = Enum.map(args, fn ref -> fn -> EMLX.Backend.to_nx({device, ref}) end end)

    eval_fun.([args])
    |> Nx.Defn.Composite.flatten_list()
    |> Enum.map(fn %Nx.Tensor{data: %{ref: {_device, ref}}} -> ref end)
  end

- fun = NifCall.run(EMLX.Runner, callback, &nif_compile(nif_args, &1))
+ read_key = {__MODULE__, :read, key}
+ :persistent_term.put(read_key, callback)
+
+ receive_fun = fn -> :persistent_term.get(read_key) end
+ fun = NifCall.run(EMLX.Runner, receive_fun, &nif_compile(nif_args, &1))

To make that work, I added the option to register functions by passing an arity 0 receive function in nif_call.

lib/runner.ex

  def handle_call({:register, owner, receive_function}, _from, state)
      when is_function(receive_function, 0) do
    function = receive_function.()
    ref = Process.monitor(owner)
    {:reply, {self(), ref}, %{state | refs: Map.put(state.refs, ref, function)}}
  end

Same question here: what’s the actual problem?

4. eval in mlx and compiliation

With this out of the way, the compilation still fails because of eval calls on C++ side which are not allowed when compiling with mlx.

I tried to avoid functions that call eval but it looks to me like it’s necessary for the way Nx backends work, at some point we must convert a tensor to a number, transfer to another backend, etc., so we must have the actual tensor data available at that point.

Is there actually a way around that? Is there already a plan how to move on?

Showing Posts 1 to 2

polvalente

polvalente

Nx Core Team

Hi, @joelpaulkoch ! The short answer is that there is no one really working on EMLX at the moment.

Thanks for the initial debugging efforts.

I am currently focusing on Nx core work, so I don’t have much bandwidth to do stuff on EMLX, but I’d be happy to coordinate an effort on this or even schedule some pair debugging and brainstorming sessions!

joelpaulkoch

joelpaulkoch OP

Thanks for the quick response and for your offer. I was just playing around for some time and I’m not sure when I will find the time to get back to EMLX.

I will reach out though when I pick it up again

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
pragdave
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates? {Textile.render(@product.long_description)} escapes the HTM...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
rlipscombe
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New
saleyn
Is there a way to import record definitions in the iex shell for pretty printing (similar to the rr command in the erl shell)? This woul...
New
rlipscombe
When I use Mix.install with a git dependency, using git@github.com:... how do I change the SSH identity used? I’ve got two Github accoun...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews