joelpaulkoch

joelpaulkoch

Hey, I know compiling with EMLX is unstable at the moment.
Is there already a plan how to make the compiler work?

I still tried to compile smollm2 with EMLX and got left with some questions.

Here a script for reproduction. I’m running this on an M2 mac.

Mix.install([
  {:bumblebee, "~> 0.6.0"},
  {:nx, "~> 0.9.0"},
  {:emlx, github: "elixir-nx/emlx"}
])

backend = {EMLX.Backend, device: :gpu}
compiler = Nx.Defn.Evaluator

Nx.global_default_backend(backend)

repo = {:hf, "HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct"}

{:ok, model_info} = Bumblebee.load_model(repo)
{:ok, tokenizer} = Bumblebee.load_tokenizer(repo)
{:ok, generation_config} = Bumblebee.load_generation_config(repo)

generation_config =
  Bumblebee.configure(generation_config,
    max_new_tokens: 256,
    strategy: %{type: :multinomial_sampling, top_p: 0.6}
  )

serving =
  Bumblebee.Text.generation(model_info, tokenizer, generation_config,
    compile: [batch_size: 1, sequence_length: 512],
    stream: false,
    defn_options: [compiler: compiler]
  )

{:ok, _pid} =
  Supervisor.start_link([{Nx.Serving, name: Serving, serving: serving}], strategy: :one_for_one)

prompt = """
<|im_start|>user
Tell me a joke<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
"""

Nx.Serving.run(serving, prompt) |> dbg
Nx.Serving.batched_run(Serving, prompt) |> dbg

1. Not compiling

When I don’t set the compile option, everything just works as compilation is disabled (just an observation, no question here).

serving =
  Bumblebee.Text.generation(model_info, tokenizer, generation_config,
-   compile: [batch_size: 1, sequence_length: 512],
    stream: false,
    defn_options: [compiler: compiler]
  )

2. Compiling with Nx.Defn.Evaluator

When I set the compile option, the compilation with Nx.Defn.Evaluator gets stuck, similar to what’s described in Basic Bumblee text embedding run seemingly stalling and Bumblebee: Slow load_model in GenServer, slow Nx.Serving.run in exs file .
Nx.Serving.run finishes, but Nx.Serving.batched_run doesn’t.

I digged deeper and found that this is the place where it gets stuck in Nx.Serving:

      wrapped_function = fn ->
        :telemetry.span([:nx, :serving, :execute], %{module: module}, fn ->
          if hooks_table do
            :ets.insert(hooks_table, {partition, ref_sizes})
          end

          {output, metadata} = function.()

          for {[ref | pids], start, size} <- ref_sizes do
            send(ref, {ref, {:batch, {start, size, output, metadata}}})

            for pid <- pids do
              send(pid, {ref, size})
            end
          end

          {:done, %{metadata: metadata, module: module}}
        end)
      end

+     :persistent_term.put(:fun, wrapped_function)
+
+     task = Task.Supervisor.async_nolink(state.task_supervisor, fn -> fun = :persistent_term.get(:fun); fun.() end)
-     task = Task.Supervisor.async_nolink(state.task_supervisor, wrapped_function)

Looks to me like the call to Task.Supervisor.async_nolink/2 never returns.

I actually ran into a similar issue when using the EMLX compiler in nif_call, I will talk about that below.
There, I found a solution which I applied here again: putting wrapped_function into persistent_term and reading it back from there inside the task.

So, this actually works.
I just have no clue why it’s not working in the original version.

I first noticed that the size of wrapped_function is large when using Nx.Defn.Evaluator compared to what EXLA is producing (size retrieved using :erts_debug.size/1: 431971 vs. 31294).
That’s why I tried storing and reading from persistent_term in the first place.
However, I can run closures of similar size as task in iex, and after all it doesn’t seem huge to me.
According to my calculations, that should be around 3.5 MB.

So, if the size is not the problem, why is this not working in the original version, but working when using persistent_term?

3. Compiling with EMLX

When using the EMLX compiler I ran into a similar issue: in nif_call, it gets stuck at passing the callback function when trying to register the function, here a GenServer.call never returns.
Here, I found the solution with persistent_term.

in lib/emlx.ex

  callback = fn args ->
    args = Enum.map(args, fn ref -> fn -> EMLX.Backend.to_nx({device, ref}) end end)

    eval_fun.([args])
    |> Nx.Defn.Composite.flatten_list()
    |> Enum.map(fn %Nx.Tensor{data: %{ref: {_device, ref}}} -> ref end)
  end

- fun = NifCall.run(EMLX.Runner, callback, &nif_compile(nif_args, &1))
+ read_key = {__MODULE__, :read, key}
+ :persistent_term.put(read_key, callback)
+
+ receive_fun = fn -> :persistent_term.get(read_key) end
+ fun = NifCall.run(EMLX.Runner, receive_fun, &nif_compile(nif_args, &1))

To make that work, I added the option to register functions by passing an arity 0 receive function in nif_call.

lib/runner.ex

  def handle_call({:register, owner, receive_function}, _from, state)
      when is_function(receive_function, 0) do
    function = receive_function.()
    ref = Process.monitor(owner)
    {:reply, {self(), ref}, %{state | refs: Map.put(state.refs, ref, function)}}
  end

Same question here: what’s the actual problem?

4. eval in mlx and compiliation

With this out of the way, the compilation still fails because of eval calls on C++ side which are not allowed when compiling with mlx.

I tried to avoid functions that call eval but it looks to me like it’s necessary for the way Nx backends work, at some point we must convert a tensor to a number, transfer to another backend, etc., so we must have the actual tensor data available at that point.

Is there actually a way around that? Is there already a plan how to move on?

Showing Posts 1 to 2

polvalente

polvalente

Nx Core Team

Hi, @joelpaulkoch ! The short answer is that there is no one really working on EMLX at the moment.

Thanks for the initial debugging efforts.

I am currently focusing on Nx core work, so I don’t have much bandwidth to do stuff on EMLX, but I’d be happy to coordinate an effort on this or even schedule some pair debugging and brainstorming sessions!

joelpaulkoch

joelpaulkoch OP

Thanks for the quick response and for your offer. I was just playing around for some time and I’m not sure when I will find the time to get back to EMLX.

I will reach out though when I pick it up again

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews