kokolegorille
Configure formatter to ignore some part of code
Hello everyone, I have a noob question about formatter…
I have this code
@attack_array [
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,0, # 0-19
0,0,0,5,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,0,0,5,0, # 20-39
0,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,0,0, # 40-59
5,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,0,0, # 60-79
2,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,6,2,6,5,0, # 80-99
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,6,4,1,4,6,0,0,0,0,0, # 100-119
0,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,0,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,0,0,0,0, # 120-139
0,0,6,3,1,3,6,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,6, # 140-159
2,6,5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,0,0,2,0,0,5, # 160-179
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,5,0,0,0, # 180-199
0,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,5,0, # 200-219
0,0,0,0,2,0,0,0,0,0,5,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,0,0, # 220-239
2,0,0,0,0,0,0,5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 # 240-256
]
@delta_array [
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -17, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -16, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, -15, 0, 0, -17, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -16, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -15, 0,
0, 0, 0, -17, 0, 0, 0, 0, -16, 0, 0, 0, 0, -15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
-17, 0, 0, 0, -16, 0, 0, 0, -15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -17, 0, 0,
-16, 0, 0, -15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -17, -33, -16, -31, -15, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -18, -17, -16, -15, -14, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15, 31,
16, 33, 17, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15, 0, 0, 16, 0, 0, 17,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15, 0, 0, 0, 16, 0, 0, 0, 17, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 16, 0, 0, 0, 0, 17, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 16, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 17, 0, 0, 15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
16, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 17, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
]
I would like obviously to keep this structure, but when I run formatter, it will output each number on a single line. I have been looking at mix format — Mix v1.20.2 but could not find a way to preserve format. Is there a way to tell formatter to ignore constants?
Thanks for taking time.
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Using Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine as an EEx.Engine is deprecated!
To compile HEEx, use Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine.compile/2 instead.
Sta...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
I am using Oban and occasionally, shortly after a deployment, a handful of jobs can fail because of dependency on other parts of the syst...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
I just stumbled on a newly redesigned elixir-lang.org. :tada: It looks like @Software_Mansion did the work, and I think it is generally a...
New
@hugobarauna and I (Alex Koutmos) have been hard at work on writing a book on Nerves that takes you from simply blinking LEDs to building...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #performance










First 6 of 6 Posts
aptinio
Only way I could think of is to enter the list as a string using heredoc and eval it with
Code.eval_string. But I haven’t tried it. I hope that helps.kokolegorille
Thank You for the response, I would prefer to set exclusion rules in formatter, but could not find it yet how to do so. If I cannot, I might use your solution
blatyo
There aren’t any exclusion rules in the formatter. The closest you could achieve is not formatting the file at all. In the
.formatter.exs, you can specify aninputspattern to match files to format. Make the pattern not match that file to have it not formatted.@aptinio’s suggestion isn’t a bad one. When I have data like this, I typically prefer to put it in a file that is conducive to the format. For me, that’s typically JSON and CSV. You can make the elixir compiler aware that you depend on a file at compile time by using
@external_resource[1].kokolegorille
Thanks for the response, I will put this code apart… and exclude the file. That will solve my problem.
kokolegorille
Using @aptinio suggestion I now have this after format…
This is good enough for me, thank You both for your advices
aptinio
I’m glad to hear it worked. I’m a stickler for code formatting but I feel this edge case is a valid reason to work around the formatter.