prateek1192

prateek1192

I am trying to take an input from the user and then creating the number of genservers as input and Supervise them. My code is something like

defmodule GossSim do
  use Supervisor

def main(args) do
  # Since it is a mix generated project I had to put the main
  Supervisor.start_link(__MODULE__, args)
end

def start_link(args) do
  Supervisor.start_link(__MODULE__, args)
end

#The two methods down below create children dynamically
def get_child_list(child_list, 0), do: child_list

def get_child_list(child_list, num_of_nodes) do
  child = 
    %{  
    id: :rand.uniform(num_of_nodes*100000),
    start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0,true]]}
  }  
  if num_of_nodes > 0 do
   
    get_child_list( [child] ++ child_list, num_of_nodes-1)
  end
end

def init(args) do
  children = get_child_list([], 10)
  # The outut of this inspect is pasted below
  IO.inspect children, label: "The children list is"
  // some function that does something parse_args_and_start(args)
  // num_of_nodes is 10
  children = get_child_list([], num_of_nodes)
  Supervisor.init(children, strategy: :simple_one_for_one)

end

I get the following error
bad child specification, invalid children: [%{id: 83303, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 186070, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 85483, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 40851, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 85216, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 390428, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 466922, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 187412, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 103750, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 176391, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}]

The Supervisor doc says that a supervisor is fine if it has a start and an id. Since children is a list I am adding multiple maps of children in it. Am i missing something. Gossip_node is a module in the same folder.

Showing Posts 1 to 6

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

You should use Dynamic Supervisor instead.

prateek1192

prateek1192 OP

Thanks for looking into it @kokolegorille
I started looking into that but then they say that

The Supervisor module was designed to handle mostly static children that are started in the given order when the supervisor starts. A DynamicSupervisor starts with no children. Instead, children are started on demand via start_child/2

I don’t need to start children on demand. When my supervisor starts up it knows what processes it needs to supervise. Anyways with that Dynamic Supervisor too I might have run into the same error when trying to supervise multiple children as I would have tried to add them into the list.

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

This is going to be deprecated… in favor of DynamicSupervisor :slight_smile:

Really…

Have a look at this thread

rvirding

rvirding

Creator of Erlang

In this case :one_for_one would be the best choice, although that will probably not fix this error.

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

But that would not solve the dynamic number of genservers, specified by the user.

rvirding

rvirding

Creator of Erlang

In one sense these are not really dynamic children. Yes, we are starting input specified number of children but from the supervisors POV it is starting the children all at start-up time so they are not dynamic. They could just as well be specified as a list of children to start.

Also there are no problems with dynamically starting children in a “normal” Supervisor. There is a Supervisor.start_child/2 which does this. This is the same as for DynamicSupervisor which also has a DynamicSupervisor.start_child/2. Both these functions need a child-spec. The main difference is how the children are terminated: in a Supervisor they are terminated in reverse order to which they were started; while in a DynamicSupervisor they are all terminated at the same time.

:simple_one_for_one is/was slightly different in that when you started the supervisor you gave one child spec which is then used as a template for all the children started/managed by it. It is/was a special case for running lots of the same thing.

Both Supervisor and DynamicSupervisor have a terminate_chlid/2 for killing children.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews