prateek1192

prateek1192

I am trying to take an input from the user and then creating the number of genservers as input and Supervise them. My code is something like

defmodule GossSim do
  use Supervisor

def main(args) do
  # Since it is a mix generated project I had to put the main
  Supervisor.start_link(__MODULE__, args)
end

def start_link(args) do
  Supervisor.start_link(__MODULE__, args)
end

#The two methods down below create children dynamically
def get_child_list(child_list, 0), do: child_list

def get_child_list(child_list, num_of_nodes) do
  child = 
    %{  
    id: :rand.uniform(num_of_nodes*100000),
    start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0,true]]}
  }  
  if num_of_nodes > 0 do
   
    get_child_list( [child] ++ child_list, num_of_nodes-1)
  end
end

def init(args) do
  children = get_child_list([], 10)
  # The outut of this inspect is pasted below
  IO.inspect children, label: "The children list is"
  // some function that does something parse_args_and_start(args)
  // num_of_nodes is 10
  children = get_child_list([], num_of_nodes)
  Supervisor.init(children, strategy: :simple_one_for_one)

end

I get the following error
bad child specification, invalid children: [%{id: 83303, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 186070, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 85483, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 40851, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 85216, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 390428, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 466922, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 187412, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 103750, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}, %{id: 176391, start: {Gossip_node, :start_link, [[0, true]]}}]

The Supervisor doc says that a supervisor is fine if it has a start and an id. Since children is a list I am adding multiple maps of children in it. Am i missing something. Gossip_node is a module in the same folder.

Showing Posts 1 to 6

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

You should use Dynamic Supervisor instead.

prateek1192

prateek1192 OP

Thanks for looking into it @kokolegorille
I started looking into that but then they say that

The Supervisor module was designed to handle mostly static children that are started in the given order when the supervisor starts. A DynamicSupervisor starts with no children. Instead, children are started on demand via start_child/2

I don’t need to start children on demand. When my supervisor starts up it knows what processes it needs to supervise. Anyways with that Dynamic Supervisor too I might have run into the same error when trying to supervise multiple children as I would have tried to add them into the list.

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

This is going to be deprecated… in favor of DynamicSupervisor :slight_smile:

Really…

Have a look at this thread

rvirding

rvirding

Creator of Erlang

In this case :one_for_one would be the best choice, although that will probably not fix this error.

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

But that would not solve the dynamic number of genservers, specified by the user.

rvirding

rvirding

Creator of Erlang

In one sense these are not really dynamic children. Yes, we are starting input specified number of children but from the supervisors POV it is starting the children all at start-up time so they are not dynamic. They could just as well be specified as a list of children to start.

Also there are no problems with dynamically starting children in a “normal” Supervisor. There is a Supervisor.start_child/2 which does this. This is the same as for DynamicSupervisor which also has a DynamicSupervisor.start_child/2. Both these functions need a child-spec. The main difference is how the children are terminated: in a Supervisor they are terminated in reverse order to which they were started; while in a DynamicSupervisor they are all terminated at the same time.

:simple_one_for_one is/was slightly different in that when you started the supervisor you gave one child spec which is then used as a template for all the children started/managed by it. It is/was a special case for running lots of the same thing.

Both Supervisor and DynamicSupervisor have a terminate_chlid/2 for killing children.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews