jschepmans

jschepmans

Hello all,

I’m going through the open source beta version of the Dockyard Academy curriculum (GitHub - DockYard-Academy/curriculum · GitHub) and I’m doing some exercises about for comprehensions.

In one of these exercises I have to convert the following nested Enum.map into a comprehension with three generators:

Enum.map(1..3, fn a -> Enum.map(1..3, fn b -> {a, b} end) end)
# Result:
[[{1, 1}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}], [{2, 1}, {2, 2}, {2, 3}], [{3, 1}, {3, 2}, {3, 3}]]

My best guess has only two generators and results in one list without sublists:

for a <- 1..3, b <- 1..3, do: {a, b}
# Result:
[{1, 1}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, {2, 1}, {2, 2}, {2, 3}, {3, 1}, {3, 2}, {3, 3}]

I assume the third generator (the one I am still missing) will create the 3 sublists. But I have no clue how this generator would look like. Any ideas?

Showing Posts 1 to 10

stevensonmt

stevensonmt

I believe you need multiple comprehensions.

for a <- 1..3 do a end
|> IO.inspect
# [1,2,3]
for a <- 1..3, b <-1..3 do {a,b} end
|> IO.inspect
#[{1,1}, {1,2}, {1,3}, {2,1}, {2,2}, {2,3}, {3,1}, {3,2}, {3,3}]
for a <-1..3 do
  for b <- 1..3 do {a,b} end
end
|> IO.inspect
# [[{1,1}, {1,2}, {1,3}], [{2,1}, {2,2}, {2,3}], [{3,1}, {3,2}, {3,3}]]
code-shoily

code-shoily

I think this can be done with only two generators (mental mapping: 1 map = 1 for, nested map = nested for), I wonder how can one convert those two maps into three for-s?

jschepmans

jschepmans OP

Thank you for the answers! I did not even think about the possibility of nesting the for’s, so I learned something new :grinning:

I still wonder how it can be done with three generators in one comprehension, like they asked. Is it even possible?

adamu

adamu

I don’t think so, seems to be an error.

dkuku

dkuku

I think it is possible with a for reduce
You can build the tuples from b,c and depending on the value of a push it to an accumulator that starts with [,,]

code-shoily

code-shoily

You are right, it can absolutely be possible with a for with reduce and two “zipped” fors as given originally. I always forget the existence of the reduce option of for comprehensions.

adamu

adamu

Reduce is not a generator, that would still only be two generators.

code-shoily

code-shoily

Is for..reduce not a generator?

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

The a <- list part of for is called a generator if one wants to be correct. Doesn’t matter if there’s a reduce or not.

code-shoily

code-shoily

yeah I had to look up the definition of generator. I am embarrassed to admit that I didn’t know what a generator meant in Elixir until now. So TIL :slight_smile:

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New
ChrisAmelia
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication): toke...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews