ream88

ream88

Hello,

I’m currently facing a challenge with my Phoenix app, which displays statistics about the products we support. I’m extending its functionality to allow users to specify a date range route parameter to filter the statistics. My goal is to define /stats and /stats/:range in my router.

However, I already have a /stats/:country route that takes a two-character ISO country code, such as /stats/AT for Austrian statistics.

  live "/stats", StatisticsLive.General
  live "/stats/:country", StatisticsLive.ByCountry
  live "/stats/:range", StatisticsLive.General

These two routes now conflict with each other, and I can’t define constraints like in Rails using the :constraints option (at least that I know of).

I now tried the following, because I have a fixed list of countries:

  live "/stats", StatisticsLive.General

  for country <- Countries.all() do
    live "/stats/#{country}", StatisticsLive.ByCountry, String.to_existing_atom(country)
  end

  live "/stats/:range", StatisticsLive.General

This works by misusing the live_action value passed to the LiveView. However, I need to convert the values to atoms back and forth, can’t access the value via the params map, don’t see it in logs, and overall, it just doesn’t feel right.

Is there a reason why this syntax isn’t currently supported?

  for country <- Countries.all() do
    live "/stats/#{country}", StatisticsLive.ByCountry, params: %{country: country}
  end

I don’t want to introduce a custom plug for this, as it reduces the clarity and visibility of my routes.

Showing Posts 1 to 6

thiagomajesk

thiagomajesk

I don’t recall Phoenix ever supporting route constraints because you can just use pattern-matching to emulate the same behavior (although I agree it could be useful as it’s more explicit and allows for conditional dispatching). The way I’d go about this is just specifying different routes, so live "/stats/country/:country" and live "/stats/range/:range". You always have the option to keep using live actions and handle_params to handle constraints.

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Routes are compiled so I don’t think something like Rails’ regex-based constraints could ever be possible. I also don’t see a big difference between params: %{country: country} and your live action approach.

I agree with @thiagomajesk that having sub routes is the way to go, but if you really don’t want to, I would make live components for each stat type and delegate in the router:

def render(%{param: param} = assigns) when param in @countries do
  ~H"""
  <.live_component id="countries" module={MyAppWeb.CountryStatsComponent} countries={@countries} />
  """
end

def render(assigns) do
  ~H"""
  <.live_component id="range" module={MyAppWeb.RangeStatsComponent} ranges={@ranges} />
  """
end

That’s just a high-level example and I’m leaving out some context—there are several ways you could accomplish this.

KP123

KP123

Am I correct in assuming that the resource is “stats” and that country and range is just a filter over those resources? If so then use a query parameter. Something like /stats?country=us&range=1-5

Edit: This has the benefit of allowing the user to select a range in a specific country instead of one or the other

ream88

ream88 OP

I will also introduce the :range filter to the country URLs like this: /stats/AT/yesterday

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

What’s the usecase for wanting URLs like this? Is there a big difference between ByCountry and General? Otherwise, filters like these are exactly what query parameters are for.

KP123

KP123

I’d still use query params for this. Instead of range I’d use from. Then you can have ranges displayed like so:

  • Range of days: /stats?from=2024-20-06&to=2024-30-06
  • A specific day: /stats?from=2024-30-06&to=2024-30-06
  • Special case values: /stats?from=yesterday

And of course every filter you dream up in the future just works /stats?from=today&country=fr&future-filter=arg

You could even do /stats?yesterday. Paths are for hierarchical data, query params for key-value data

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews