freewebwithme
I need some help to understand writing test for async function
For example I have a function
def send_notification({:ok, nessage}, to, title, body) do
Task.Supervisor.async_nolink(MyApp.TaskSupervisor, fn ->
send(to, title, body)
end)
end
def create(to, title, body) do
to
|> create_message(title, body)
|> send(to, title, body)
|> log_message()
end
If I run test for create function, I got an error
13:19:41.877 [error] Postgrex.Protocol (#PID<0.1313.0>) disconnected: ** (DBConnection.ConnectionError) owner #PID<0.4033.0> exited
Client #PID<0.4035.0> is still using a connection from owner at location:
:prim_inet.recv0/3
(postgrex 0.16.5) lib/postgrex/protocol.ex:3171: Postgrex.Protocol.msg_recv/4
(postgrex 0.16.5) lib/postgrex/protocol.ex:2871: Postgrex.Protocol.recv_transaction/4
(postgrex 0.16.5) lib/postgrex/protocol.ex:2180: Postgrex.Protocol.rebind_execute/4
(ecto_sql 3.9.1) lib/ecto/adapters/sql/sandbox.ex:375: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.Connection.proxy/3
(db_connection 2.4.3) lib/db_connection/holder.ex:354: DBConnection.Holder.holder_apply/4
(db_connection 2.4.3) lib/db_connection.ex:1413: DBConnection.run_execute/5
(db_connection 2.4.3) lib/db_connection.ex:1508: DBConnection.run/6
(db_connection 2.4.3) lib/db_connection.ex:701: DBConnection.execute/4
(ecto_sql 3.9.1) lib/ecto/adapters/postgres/connection.ex:102: Ecto.Adapters.Postgres.Connection.execute/4
(ecto_sql 3.9.1) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:858: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.execute!/5
(ecto_sql 3.9.1) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:828: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.execute/6
(ecto 3.9.4) lib/ecto/repo/queryable.ex:229: Ecto.Repo.Queryable.execute/4
(ecto 3.9.4) lib/ecto/repo/queryable.ex:19: Ecto.Repo.Queryable.all/3
(ecto 3.9.4) lib/ecto/repo/preloader.ex:272: Ecto.Repo.Preloader.fetch_query/8
(elixir 1.14.2) lib/enum.ex:1658: Enum."-map/2-lists^map/1-0-"/2
(ecto 3.9.4) lib/ecto/repo/preloader.ex:72: Ecto.Repo.Preloader.preload_each/4
(ecto 3.9.4) lib/ecto/repo/preloader.ex:51: Ecto.Repo.Preloader.normalize_and_preload_each/5
(ecto 3.9.4) lib/ecto/repo/preloader.ex:46: Ecto.Repo.Preloader.preload/4
And I read the doc But I can’t figure out how to write test for this async function
And sandbox is :manual mode
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.mode(MyAppRepo, :manual)
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
In
manualmode, the sandbox works with Task behind the scenes to ensure that the task process getsallowed to share the connection with the caller.HOWEVER
That means that the task cannot outlive the test process, or you’ll get the error you’re seeing.
A quick way to check if this might be causing your issue would be to add
Process.sleep(5000)or similar to the end of the test that’s failing. That will ensure the call tosendcompletes before the test does.bolducp
@al2o3cr Do you have advice about the best way to handle this in a test? I’ve got some code that uses
Task.startto call some side effect functions that I don’t care about the results of. But my tests that uses the parent function are returning this error now, because the Task is trying to outlive the test.Is the best way to insert
Process.sleep/1statements? Or is there a better way?tim.jarratt
I’ve been fighting this exact same problem in some of the tests in a project at work. I’m not using the Task API, but I see the same problem when testing GenServers and with some async LiveViews.
Our current approach is to have our tests safely kill the spawned process, and to ensure it has stopped before the test ends. The reason for this is that the fundamental problem is that the spawned process is killed while it is still expecting to receive data from the Postgrex process – which rightly complains when the process on the other end disappears.
I’d love for this to be easier, but right now we need to spend a lot of time identifying which tests are failing, and then building custom ways to ensure our process is either stopped cleanly or isn’t in the middle of a query.
josevalim
Nowadays we have proper abstractions in place so this doesn’t happen as often.
First, for managing connections, make sure you are using the start_owner API: todo_trek/test/support/data_case.ex at main · chrismccord/todo_trek · GitHub
When you are starting processes under test, use
start_supervisor!from ExUnit, which guarantees it will be shut down before the test process.Finally, if you are starting tasks or processes under a supervisor dynamically, add an
on_exitcallback that gets all children of said supervisor and wait for them to terminate. Something like:Joep
When searching for
start_supervisor!in the docs I get no results: Search — ExUnit v1.20.2!I suppose you mean start_supervised!/2 ?
dimitarvp
Yep, that’s the one.