threeaccents

threeaccents

I wanted to see how others deal with private and public function defaults conflict. In my context I like to have public functions that take the current_user from the request what ever other arguments are needed with a “matching” private function that only takes the arguments after the public function does some authorization.

here is a quick example of update user

# user context
def update_user(%User{} = current_user, %UpdateUser{} = update_user) do
    with :ok <- authorize(:update_user, current_user, update_user),
        {:ok, updated_user} <- update_user(update_user) do
        # some logic
    end
end

defp update_user(%UpdateUser{} = update_user) do
  # some logic
end

This works great 95% of the time but sometimes certain functions need to have default parameters

def list_company_users(%User{} = current_user, company_id, filters \\ %{}) do
    # some logic
end

defp list_company_users(company_id, filters) do 
  # some logic
end

For situations like this there is a conflict of having a private and a public function
defp list_company_users/2 conflicts with defaults from list_company_users/3

As a hacky workaround I made the arguments of the private function a tuple.

defp list_company_users({company_id, filters}) do 
  # some logic
end

I was curious if anyone else used a similar pattern and what solution they’ve taken when running into this issue.

Showing Posts 1 to 8

sanswork

sanswork

Personally I’d use different names for the private functions. To add to this I know _function is pretty common for private, personally I use function/do_function

def update_user
defp do_update_user

Anything will work as long as you’re consistent though then you don’t have to go check the def.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Seconded, I use the do_* private functions notations myself. Mostly because I have no better idea. :smiley:

Aetherus

Aetherus

It seems that do_* has become a convention :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:
By the way, I follow this convention, too.

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

There is no way to detect if You call list_company_users/3 without filter, and list_company_users/2

You might add guard clauses…

# Use when is_binary if You use binary id.
def list_company_users(%User{} = current_user, company_id, filters \\ %{}) when is_integer(company_id) do
    # some logic
end

defp list_company_users(company_id, filters) when is_map(filters) do 
  # some logic
end

I also prefer do_* for private functions…

You might also check how to use function’s signature

eksperimental

eksperimental

Personally I would recommend against prefixing them with do_ most of the times.
If you can find a more descriptive name, use it. If you cannot, or it is too cumbersome, use do_ then.
It does not matter if the name of the function is long, it is private anyway.

In Elixir core the use of do_ has been discouraged, and while at the beginning it was a bit annoying once you get used it, it pays off.

In your first example, I would refactor it, by swapping the arguments of the arity-2 function. I hope you can see the benefit of it.

def update_user(%UpdateUser{} = update_user, %User{} = current_user) do
    with :ok <- authorize(:update_user, current_user, update_user),
        {:ok, updated_user} <- update_user(update_user) do
        # some logic
    end
end

defp update_user(%UpdateUser{} = update_user) do
  # some logic
end

As for your second example, I will rename your second function to a more meaningful name.

def list_company_users(%User{} = current_user, company_id, filters \\ %{}) do
    # some logic
end

defp filter_company_users(company_id, filters) do 
  # some logic
end
threeaccents

threeaccents OP

Thank you for all the replies. It does seem the Elixir community has a convention of doing do_* for private functions. I’m going to try it out and see how it feels.

Thank you everyone for the replies!

eksperimental

eksperimental

This is one of my favorite patterns, the _guarded suffix. You do all your guard checks in your public function, and you delegate to a private one and call it recursively if needed, without checking for a guard again and increasing performance.

This is the current implementation for Keyword.update/4

  @spec update(t, key, default :: value, (existing_value :: value -> new_value :: value)) :: t
  def update(keywords, key, default, fun)
      when is_list(keywords) and is_atom(key) and is_function(fun, 1) do
    update_guarded(keywords, key, default, fun)
  end

  defp update_guarded([{key, value} | keywords], key, _default, fun) do
    [{key, fun.(value)} | delete(keywords, key)]
  end

  defp update_guarded([{_, _} = pair | keywords], key, default, fun) do
    [pair | update_guarded(keywords, key, default, fun)]
  end

  defp update_guarded([], key, default, _fun) do
    [{key, default}]
  end
dmitrykleymenov

dmitrykleymenov

Wow, this is really nice and new for me. I’ve used the same concept, but when it is explicitly named, looks much better.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews