zachallaun
Hi friends,
I’m working on a contribution to Finch and am having a hell of a time debugging an unexpected process exit that’s causing a test to fail.
The code being tested is rather unfinished and very much a work-in-progress, but I wanted to have a baseline before I start refactoring and moving things around. When the test reaches the call to cancel the async request, the test fails (not immediately, but after a very small period), with the following message:
Things I’ve tried so far:
- Re-creating the issue without using Finch (I couldn’t)
- Running the code outside of the context of a test (it works as expected)
- Creating the process with a Task supervisor (what’s currently in the code)
- Creating the process with
Task.async - Creating the process with
spawn - Various exit trapping
I have a hunch this has something to do with ExUnit’s GenServer, but I’m really struggling to find more information and I’m at a loss for how to debug further.
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Hey guys,
I’ve got a huge CSV ( around 10 GB ) that needs to be processed hourly
Do you guys have any suggestions what is the best prac...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Kia ora,
We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #ai
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
The message looks a lot like the symptom from this issue:
https://github.com/PSPDFKit-labs/bypass/issues/120
This could be happening when the
Taskterminates while still waiting for a reply from Bypass, causing the Bypass process to crash and taking the test process down along with it.You could try trapping exits in the test and calling
receiveexplicitly to see what’s bubbling up.Another thing to try: add a sleep for longer than the sleep in the
Bypass.expectblock to the very end of the test, so that the Bypass process is definitely finished before the test ends.zachallaun
That looks really promising. I cloned Bypass and changed the dep to a local path-based one and then tried fixing the line referenced in that issue and removing it altogether, both to no avail. It does seem likely that it’s taking down the Bypass server somehow.
hkrutzer
Maybe
sysdebug can help? Debug tracing · Elixir Recipeszachallaun
That was a good idea.
So it looks like Bypass is sending an exit shutdown message to what I presume to be the test server. I’m not entirely sure why or what I can do to prevent it.
Edit: Looking at the code, it’s Bypass that’s exiting here.
Edit 2: And, indeed, if I modify Bypass to not exit at that line, the test works.
pcruz
I know it’s a bit late, but I have also encountered this problem, and I was able to resolve it by calling the
Bypass.downfunction before the end of the test:I hope this helps someone in the future.
RudManusachi
Bypass.down(bypass)for us didn’t work.However, what works is “overriding” the
on_exitfor the bypass so that it doesn’t try to verify the expectations.Some notes on my investigation:
In order to reproduce the issue we could do the following:
Basically the idea is to simulate that in the code, despite being asynchronous, actually makes the request that reaches out Bypass server.. But the test exits prior to the Bypass sending the response and. And since the test exists it shuts down Bypass!
However,
Bypass.open()prematurely setson_exitcallback where it makes a synchronousGenServer.callto Bypass to verify all its expectations. And the state of Bypass at that moment is erroneous:exit, :shutdownthat’s being raised.Knowing those details, I didn’t really want to comment that line in the Bypass source, since I think it’s still valuable for
Bypass.expect(when the request was made, but test finishes prior to Bypass responding.. though the error could have been better, but in that case the developer might want explicitly synchronize the test with Bypass maybe by some message passing andassert_receive)I made this patch but I thing it’s not as reliable as overriding
on_exitcallback.. since forBypass.stubthere should be no verification of expectations.. at lieast not on the number of requests