dpreston

dpreston

Is there a built-in way to decode json that has a list of objects that are not decoded to the same struct, and the list is not at the root of the json?
Its a large, deeply nested json payload from a 3rd party, and I would prefer not to recursively decode and replace each list, but thats the only solution I have so far. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Poison can do this if the list is the root,

defmodule TypeA do
  defstruct shared: "", only_a: ""
end

defmodule TypeB do
  defstruct shared: "", only_b: ""
end

options = fn
  %{only_a: _a} -> %TypeA{}
  %{only_b: _b} -> %TypeB{}
end

"""
[
  {
    "shared": "value",
    "only_a": "A!"
  }, 
  {
    "shared": "value",
    "only_b": "B!"
  }
]
"""
|> Poison.decode!([keys: :atoms!, as: [options]])
[
  %TypeA{shared: "value", only_a: "A!"}, 
  %TypeB{shared: "value", only_b: "B!"}
]

but if there is a parent struct, the children objects just decode to plain maps.

defmodule Parent do
  defstruct children: []
end

"""
{ 
  "children": [
    {
      "shared": "value",
      "only_a": "A!"
    }, 
    {
      "shared": "value",
      "only_b": "B!"
    }
  ]
}
"""
|> Poison.decode!( as: %Parent{})
%Parent{
  children: [
    %{"only_a" => "A!", "shared" => "value"}, 
    %{"only_b" => "B!", "shared" => "value"}
  ]
}

I’ve tried adding the as: function to the %Parent{} struct definition, but its not a valid value.

defmodule Parent do
  children = fn
    %{only_a: _a} -> %TypeA{}
    %{only_b: _b} -> %TypeB{}
  end

  defstruct children: children # <- invalid value
end

Showing Posts 1 to 2

mudasobwa

mudasobwa

Creator of Cure

Another option would be a custom Poison’s encoder implementation for structs like Parent.

I would nevertheless stick with straight parsing into maps and then upgrading them to structs with update_in/3 through Access. That’d be more explicit. Like

%{root: %{lvl1: [%{only_a: :a}, %{only_b: :b}]}}
|> update_in([:root, :lvl1, Access.all()], options)

%{
  root: %{
    lvl1: [%TypeA{shared: "", only_a: ""}, %TypeB{shared: "", only_b: ""}]
  }
}```
dpreston

dpreston OP

Thanks @mudasobwa, for prompting me to dig further into the decoders

I’ve gone with custom Poison decoders for each of the relevant structs. It’s really simple to just add the possible structs to the children_types in the decode function and it catches them all on the first pass instead of needing to rewalk the object until all the structs have been matched.

defmodule TypeA do
  defstruct shared: "", only_a: ""
end

defmodule TypeB do
  defstruct shared: "", only_b: ""
end

defmodule Parent do
  defstruct name: "", children: []
end

defimpl Poison.Decoder, for: Parent do
  def decode(value, options) do
    children_types = fn
      %{only_a: _a} -> %TypeA{}
      %{only_b: _b} -> %TypeB{}
    end

    value
    |> Map.update!(:children, fn children ->
      children
      |> Enum.map(
        &Poison.Decode.transform(
          &1,
          Map.put(options, :as, children_types)
        )
      )
    end)
  end
end
"""
{ 
  "name": "parent",
  "children": [
    {
      "shared": "value",
      "only_a": "A"
    }, 
    {
      "shared": "value",
      "only_b": "B"
    }
  ]
}
"""
|> Poison.decode!(keys: :atoms!, as: %Parent{})
%Parent{
  name: "parent",
  children: [
    %TypeA{shared: "value", only_a: "A"}, 
    %TypeB{shared: "value", only_b: "B"}
  ]
}
— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews