amirOrbe
Hi everyone, I have a function with two parameters with default values something like:
def(param1 \\ %{}, param2 \\ "") do
###
end
this is the best practice for do that? or you know another way ?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
srcoulombe
You can also use functions from the Keyword module
zachdaniel
I’ve learned the hard way that if you ever have more than one optional argument its a smell and you should refactor it to an
optslistamirOrbe
amazing! @srcoulombe and @zachdaniel thanks for you advice
dimitarvp
Absolutely never do this. Your colleagues or even your own future self will forget or be in a hurry just once and introduce a bug that would be difficult to track down.
Either only one optional argument and it must 99% of the time be the last one – unless the differences in type will make it completely obvious if something goes wrong – or use a keyword list as others have said. That approach also allows you to easily name stuff f.ex.
gushonorato
Or, using
Keyword.validate!/2, would be better.thiagomajesk
You have no idea how much I agree with this @zachdaniel, and it bites too many people in the butt too frequently. Maybe it should be part of the anti-patterns documentation!?
I’ve been working with Elixir for a long time now, how come I’ve missed this gem!? I surely must have overlooked it. Thanks for sharing!
derek-zhou
Never say never
. If param2 depends on param1, I don’t see why not.
Independent optional arguments should be in keyword list for sure.
zachdaniel
I don’t see why you’d need multiple default arguments for that? You can detect presence with keyword lists and derive defaults etc.
D4no0
I personally have found default arguments to be a good tool for trolling, as the default arguments are not restricted to the last arguments only as in many other languages, hence this is valid code too:
garrison
You know, it really bothers me knowing that KW lists require O(n) iteration over the list to extract the argument. I know full well that it will (almost) never matter in practice and I’m pretty sure it’s actually pushed down to native code, but I wince every time anyway…
Of course, I still use them frequently because named args can’t be beat for readability when you have a lot of them.