amirOrbe
Hi everyone, I have a function with two parameters with default values something like:
def(param1 \\ %{}, param2 \\ "") do
###
end
this is the best practice for do that? or you know another way ?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
srcoulombe
You can also use functions from the Keyword module
zachdaniel
I’ve learned the hard way that if you ever have more than one optional argument its a smell and you should refactor it to an
optslistamirOrbe
amazing! @srcoulombe and @zachdaniel thanks for you advice
dimitarvp
Absolutely never do this. Your colleagues or even your own future self will forget or be in a hurry just once and introduce a bug that would be difficult to track down.
Either only one optional argument and it must 99% of the time be the last one – unless the differences in type will make it completely obvious if something goes wrong – or use a keyword list as others have said. That approach also allows you to easily name stuff f.ex.
gushonorato
Or, using
Keyword.validate!/2, would be better.thiagomajesk
You have no idea how much I agree with this @zachdaniel, and it bites too many people in the butt too frequently. Maybe it should be part of the anti-patterns documentation!?
I’ve been working with Elixir for a long time now, how come I’ve missed this gem!? I surely must have overlooked it. Thanks for sharing!
derek-zhou
Never say never
. If param2 depends on param1, I don’t see why not.
Independent optional arguments should be in keyword list for sure.
zachdaniel
I don’t see why you’d need multiple default arguments for that? You can detect presence with keyword lists and derive defaults etc.
D4no0
I personally have found default arguments to be a good tool for trolling, as the default arguments are not restricted to the last arguments only as in many other languages, hence this is valid code too:
garrison
You know, it really bothers me knowing that KW lists require O(n) iteration over the list to extract the argument. I know full well that it will (almost) never matter in practice and I’m pretty sure it’s actually pushed down to native code, but I wince every time anyway…
Of course, I still use them frequently because named args can’t be beat for readability when you have a lot of them.