sezaru
Hey guys, I have some files that implement a protocol for some resources for my tests (they are only compiled when running tests:
defimpl Core.Support.Factory.Builder, for: Core.Marketplace.Chat.PropertyMessage do
def attributes(_message) do
...
end
def build!(user, _opts) do
...
end
end
Before 1.19, this would work just fine, after the upgrade, I now get this warning:
warning: you are implementing a protocol for Core.Marketplace.Chat.PropertyMessage but said module is not available. Make sure the module name is correct. If Core.Marketplace.Chat.PropertyMessage is an optional dependency, please wrap the protocol implementation in a Code.ensure_loaded?(Core.Marketplace.Chat.PropertyMessage) check
│
1 │ defimpl Core.Support.Factory.Builder, for: Core.Marketplace.Chat.PropertyMessage do
│ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
│
└─ test/support/factory/marketplace/chat/property_message.ex:1: (file)
and then the tests that expect this will break.
Did something change in 1.19 related to defimpl or is this a bug?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
josevalim
You need to move the implementations to when the protocol is defined, or define them conditionally only for tests.
Once the type system is in place, if we don’t have the protocol definition, it will be impossible to check if the implementation is correct.
sezaru
Do you mean move this code to the same file of the implementation and adding
To it?
Is there some way to declare the dependency on that module before calling defimpl so I don’t have to move test code from
test/tolib/?josevalim
My understanding is that the protocol is only defined in test, right? So you could also move the implementation to test.
sezaru
The protocol and implementation of it (
defimpl) is only in test, but the modelu that the implementation references is in lib.In other words, the module
Core.Marketplace.Chat.PropertyMessagein located inlib/core/marketplace/chat/property_message.ex, thedefimpl Core.Support.Factory.Builder, for: Core.Marketplace.Chat.PropertyMessageis located intest/support/factory/marketplace/chat/property_message.exand the protocol declarationdefprotocol Core.Support.Factory.Builderis located intest/support/factory/builder.ex.Before 1.19, this would work just fine, after 1.19, it started giving the warning/error I mentioned in the first post.
josevalim
This should indeed work. Any chance you can isolate it into a reproducible example so we can address it?
sezaru
Hey @josevalim I made a reproducible example, here is the link: GitHub - sezaru/test_new_elixir · GitHub
Basically you just need to compile it using
MIX_ENV=test mix compileit will generate the following warning:
Making the example, basically what makes this warning appears or not is the line 11 of the file
lib/core/marketplace/chat/property_message.ex:This lines add the embedded Ash resource
Attachmentas an attribute of my Ash resourcePropertyMessage.If I remove that line, then the warning disappears.
The same code works fine in Elixir 1.18.
Maybe @zachdaniel knows why this triggers the warning?
josevalim
If I remove Ash, then it works. By using
–profile time, we can see that Ash is deadlocking the compiler:The fact that attachment is waiting for
:embeddedalso points to what is more likely a bug. My suggestion is for Ash to move some of the validations in its DSL to verify callbacks. If the compiler is deadlocked, then it assumes the modules are not there, leading to the warning.sezaru
Thanks for finding the root cause @josevalim I will create an issue in Ash’s repo and link to this post.
zachdaniel
Pretty much all of our validations happen in verifiers, but I will look into this for sure
zachdaniel
This was indeed an issue w/ the
:embeddedreference there. In Ash, there is a short-hand ofdata_layer: :embedded. We were treating that as an extension module insparkand attempting to call a function on it. This is fixed in2.3.7of spark.