stevensonmt
I would like to have a struct in a module without default values for the fields, but I would like each field to be limited to a specific type. Is there a way to define and enforce this in Elixir?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
Hey guys,
I’ve got a huge CSV ( around 10 GB ) that needs to be processed hourly
Do you guys have any suggestions what is the best prac...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I have what I’ve heard referred to as a “lookup table” in my database. This is a way of assigning codes to common values. One common lo...
New
Hello,
I’m developing a online persistent chat system (what’s app) like using elixir/dynamodb/aws for a mobile app(flutter).
The diffic...
New
What approach to take when sending live updates to “random” users Hi! I have a question, I have a little chat app, and when I create a DM...
New
I think I’ve found a small improvement I could contribute to <%= web_namespace %>.CoreComponents (installer/templates/phx_web/compo...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
There are three potential reasons for members of this forum to have a look at https://vutuv.de
You are tired or annoyed of LinkedIn.
Yo...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
lud
You can define a typespec for your struct but you cannot enforce it.
What you can do in your module is to use a constructor-like function:
(
newis not a special name)hauleth
I think that in this case
struct!/2(with bang) will make more sense.lud
I hesitated because if you validate the values beforehand you should not have to use it, but yes it may be safer.
@stevensonmt the difference is that
struct!/2will raise if the given props have extra properties or if keys declared with@enforce_keysare not defined.stevensonmt
Thank you! If using
struct!/2it may raise an exception at runtime and crash, but if using the suggestednew/1constructor you can handle the exceptions gracefully, is that right?lud
No because as I’ve said,
newis not special, it is just a function that you have to define (you could call itcreateor anything else), and in that function (see my snippet) you call eitherstruct/2orstruct!/2. So it is up to you if you allow to raise.stevensonmt
Oh, I see,
structvsstruct!in the constructor function. Thanks!al2o3cr
AFAIK using either
structorstruct!doesn’t let Dialyzer “see” what’s happening, and that’s what’s doing the type-enforcement when you use something liketyped_struct. The only difference between the two is thatstructsilently ignores keys it doesn’t understand, whilestruct!raises.Writing a literal will complain, though:
%SomeStruct{key: "value_of_wrong_type"}.You could accomplish a similar result by carefully type-specing your
newfunction as well.brettbeatty
You can always reduce the opts into your struct however you want. You can validate, rename, transform, do whatever.
A simple example where opts of the wrong type are simply rejected
stevensonmt
That’s a great tip. Can I ask what the first
defp put_opt(opt, acc)without further definition is for?brettbeatty
Oh sorry it’s a personal preference when I create a function with multiple clauses to have that. In my opinion it makes it clearer what the args should be, often helps with docs (for public functions), and gives me somewhere to put
@doc,@spec, etc. It’s only really required when you have multiple clauses for a function that takes default arguments. Kernel — Elixir v1.20.2