stevensonmt
I would like to have a struct in a module without default values for the fields, but I would like each field to be limited to a specific type. Is there a way to define and enforce this in Elixir?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
lud
You can define a typespec for your struct but you cannot enforce it.
What you can do in your module is to use a constructor-like function:
(
newis not a special name)hauleth
I think that in this case
struct!/2(with bang) will make more sense.lud
I hesitated because if you validate the values beforehand you should not have to use it, but yes it may be safer.
@stevensonmt the difference is that
struct!/2will raise if the given props have extra properties or if keys declared with@enforce_keysare not defined.stevensonmt
Thank you! If using
struct!/2it may raise an exception at runtime and crash, but if using the suggestednew/1constructor you can handle the exceptions gracefully, is that right?lud
No because as I’ve said,
newis not special, it is just a function that you have to define (you could call itcreateor anything else), and in that function (see my snippet) you call eitherstruct/2orstruct!/2. So it is up to you if you allow to raise.stevensonmt
Oh, I see,
structvsstruct!in the constructor function. Thanks!al2o3cr
AFAIK using either
structorstruct!doesn’t let Dialyzer “see” what’s happening, and that’s what’s doing the type-enforcement when you use something liketyped_struct. The only difference between the two is thatstructsilently ignores keys it doesn’t understand, whilestruct!raises.Writing a literal will complain, though:
%SomeStruct{key: "value_of_wrong_type"}.You could accomplish a similar result by carefully type-specing your
newfunction as well.brettbeatty
You can always reduce the opts into your struct however you want. You can validate, rename, transform, do whatever.
A simple example where opts of the wrong type are simply rejected
stevensonmt
That’s a great tip. Can I ask what the first
defp put_opt(opt, acc)without further definition is for?brettbeatty
Oh sorry it’s a personal preference when I create a function with multiple clauses to have that. In my opinion it makes it clearer what the args should be, often helps with docs (for public functions), and gives me somewhere to put
@doc,@spec, etc. It’s only really required when you have multiple clauses for a function that takes default arguments. Kernel — Elixir v1.20.2