maennchen
I’m trying to fix all dialyzer warnings in quantum for the next big release. There are two errors which I’m not able to solve.
The errors are:
lib/quantum.ex:69: The created fun has no local return
lib/quantum/normalizer.ex:37: Function normalize/2 has no local return
Here is the spec which I think is offending dialyzer.
# Quantum.Normalizer.normalize/2
@spec normalize(Job.t, config_full_notation | config_short_notation) :: Job.t | no_return
Involved Files:
- https://github.com/jshmrtn/quantum-elixir/blob/5ace42c7e88ecdb7eb6b0fdea768b430ed18b61d/lib/quantum/normalizer.ex
- https://github.com/jshmrtn/quantum-elixir/blob/5ace42c7e88ecdb7eb6b0fdea768b430ed18b61d/lib/quantum.ex
Steps tried to solve the issue:
- Added
no_returnto the specs return type - Tried to locate a specific function that causes the problem
Both steps were not succesfull.
The current progress can be seen in this WIP PR: https://github.com/c-rack/quantum-elixir/pull/255
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
NobbZ
config_full_notationand*_short_*are both tuples, but you are guarding for them beeing lists and maps viais_list/1andis_map/1in the heads ofQuantum.Normalizer.normalize/2..Since I do assume your tests are passing, it seems as if the definition for your option-types is wrong.
Since it just wraps
Quantum.Normalizer.normalize/2with some prefilled arguments, its just bubbling up. FixQuantum.Normalizer.normalize/2and this warning will vanish.edit
Okay I realise that only one of many heads checks for a list, but that one is causing the issue. Just change the spec to allow a list of those configs as well…
maennchen
Thanks for taking the time to look at the issue
I already tried adding
| Keyword.tto theconfig_full_notation. This had now effect on the errors. Is this what you mean with your feedback?Changes Made:
NobbZ
Here you require job to be a list. Guessing from the implementation it seems to be a list of configs. That’s not covered by your spec.
maennchen
If I remove this function clause entirely, I get the same error. So I’m not sure that this is the problem.
Ajwah
@maennchen
I understand that this issue is a few months old and that ever since the code base has advanced significantly.
Nevertheless, I have this same issue in my code base myself, and after a lot of trying I was unable to locate the root issue.
In order to get more insight, I decided to git pull that commit of yours and see if I could resolve the issue.
The issue you were having at that time was simply that
@fieldscontained more types than covered by@typep field@fields [:name, :schedule, :task, :overlap, :run_strategy, :timezone]@typep field :: :name | :schedule | :task | :overlap | :run_strategy # :timezone is missing hereOnce you add that in, dialyzer works just fine.
BTW: You should also remove
| no_return.no_returnmeans that you are dealing with a function call that will not return any value, such as an infinite recursion. By you specifying:: Job.t | no_return, dialyzer unions that to be simply::: no_return.Although the error may disappear(which in this case it did not), effectively your spec fails to reflect the actual nature of your code.
It is as if you would have added that as part of the ignore under: dialyzer.ignore_warnings file
maennchen
@Ajwah Thanks for your explanation. I never really understood how we solved the issue until now.
When you‘re saying that we should remove the no_return, do you mean the current codebase? I thought that the no_return is currect there because we are raising exceptions.
Ajwah
@maennchen I was speaking about the past code base. I have not looked at master, but based on what you are saying, if you are using
no_returnonly when raising exceptions, then I agree that such is correct usage of it.In the past codebase, because you were desperate to resolve that error: Function has no local return, there were multiple cases where the return type was annotated as
:: Job.t | no_returnDialyzer will interpret that as a mere
:: no_return, discarding any consideration forJob.tdom
no_return means there is no local return whatsoever, the function can only crash or loop infinitely. If the function can return a value in at least one code path, then it should not be labeled no_return.