DaAnalyst

DaAnalyst

The following is a snippet depicting my use case:

defmodule Abstract do
  @callback foo() :: binary()

  defmacro __using__( _) do
    quote do
      @behavior Abstract
 
      @impl true
      def foo() do
        raise RuntimeError, "shouldn't have been invoked!"
      end

      defoverridable Abstract
    end
  end
end

defmodule SpecificA do
  use Abstract
end

defmodule SpecificB do
  use Abstract

  @impl true
  def foo() do
    "foo"
  end
end

The problem is dialyzer keeps on showing this warning that foo/0 default implementation in SpecificA “has no local return”. Even if I change the callback return value to binary() | no_return(), it still gives the same warning.

Any ideas on how to circumvent the dialyzer warning without providing a dummy implementation of the foo/0 in SpecificA?

Thanks

Showing Posts 1 to 6

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

I believe this specific situation is the same as what motivates this code in GenServer:

https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/blob/d33e934021cefda220da4b1720e59e996a03aa52/lib/elixir/lib/gen_server.ex#L799-L802

josevalim

josevalim

Creator of Elixir

In your case, it is better to not provide a default implantation and either let the compile warn or mark the callback as optional. :slight_smile:

DaAnalyst

DaAnalyst OP

@optional_callbacks it is.

Thanks!

rvirding

rvirding

Creator of Erlang

The basic reason is that raise generates an error so the function foo never returns. Dialyzer recognises this.

snofang

snofang

What if the foo function has a more serious default implementation? Such as those that exist in ‘GenServer’ for default callbacks implementations(e.g. handle-*)

If the original @DaAnalyst’s question’s code modified as such:

defmodule Abstract do
  @callback foo() :: {:ok, binary()} | {:error, binary()}
  # EDIT: Even by marking it as optional, Dialyzer complains
  @optional_callbacks foo: 0

  defmacro __using__(_) do
    quote do
      @behaviour Abstract

      @impl true
      def foo() do
        {:ok, "Evrything is good:~"}
      end

      def bar() do
        case foo() do
          {:ok, message} -> IO.puts(message)
          {:error, message} -> IO.puts(message)
        end
      end

      defoverridable foo: 0
    end
  end
end

defmodule SpecificA do
  use Abstract
end

Dialyzer complains:

ElixirLS Dialyzer: The pattern 
          {'error', _@2} can never match the type 
          {'ok', <<_:152>>}

How to say/trick Dialyzer to not complain?

snofang

snofang

Applying the trick mentioned by @al2o3cr,

Dialyzer does not complain anymore:

  defmodule Abstract do
    @callback foo() :: {:ok, binary()} | {:error, binary()}

    defmacro __using__(_) do
      quote do
        @behaviour Abstract

        @impl true
        def foo() do
          case :erlang.phash2(1, 1) do
            0 ->
              {:ok, "Evrything is good:~"}

            1 ->
              {:error, "This is not possible to execute"}
          end
        end

        def bar() do
          case foo() do
            {:ok, message} -> IO.puts(message)
            {:error, message} -> IO.puts(message)
          end
        end

        defoverridable foo: 0
      end
    end
  end

  defmodule SpecificA do
    use Abstract
  end

Thank you

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
jonnycharles
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
spammy
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
dli
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app? Looking for hints regarding: Addi...
New
roeland
Kia ora, We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
bottlenecked
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps. Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
rahultumpala
Hello, I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
mcass19
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge &amp; Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews