hariharasudhan94
Can Someone please explain difference between anonymous and named functions ? where we need to use Anonynous and Named functions?
From the Agents tutorial they use
@doc “”"
Gets a value from thebucketbykey.
“”"
def get(bucket, key) do
Agent.get(bucket, &Map.get(&1, key))
end
in the above example they have used named function Map.get/3 as Anonymous function by using Capture opertaor. Is there any particular reason to use ?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
kokolegorille
an anonymous function is not attached to a module.
example
my_func = fn x → IO.puts x end
and You call it like this
my_func.(“yo”)
Please note the dot
Map.get is a named function
hariharasudhan94
Is there Any particular reason to use named function
Map.get/3as anonymous function as&Map.get(&1, key)?kokolegorille
Passing a function is so usual, that there is this & &1 notation, but it does not mean that Map.get is anonymous.
You can do like something like this with a more complex function
Otherwise, You should have done
And note that
&Map.get(&1, key)
is equivalent to
fn x → Map.get(x, key) end
It is not equivalent to Map.get(x, key)
hariharasudhan94
Thanks man , i found this stack page with more info, but i am not clear about
what is mean by
empty variable scope?NobbZ
Well, simply that there are no variables bound in the scope.
hariharasudhan94
from this example
after we declare
def, do u mean that onlyyis bound to the scope of the function aloneNobbZ
As you can see here, the
defed function has no access to theathat was bound outside, its scope is therefore “empty”peerreynders
As a statement that is incorrect. An anonymous function is attached to the module that creates it [source].
Execution of the anonymous function will force the module that created it to load - and if that module cannot be loaded, execution of the anonymous function will fail - no matter how simple that anonymous function might be.
Example session: