mattfara50
I’m still in the beginning phases of Elixir. I come from a Java background, where I tried incorporating functional concepts as often as possible. I’m therefore very interested in using Dialyzer, and hopefully I can get the hang of product/sum types for domain modeling.
My question is this: does using Dialyzer allow you to code Elixir differently? For example, would my code require fewer pattern matches?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
BartOtten
Short answer: no
Longer answer: It might spot some type errors which allows you to improve the code. But Dialyzer itself does not ‘change’ code. All it does is check specifications (‘@spec’) and guesses types when specs are not provided. Dialyzer has nothing to do with runtime, nor with optimizing code.
Afaik typing (and so specs) are used by Erlang compiler to optimize some code. See the changelog of Erlang 24 and 25.
My 2ct: the specs are cool when you use a library; makes it easy to see what is expected. When you have to read code they add a lot of clutter; especially for small functions.
Note to self: find plugin or theme for Emacs that hides them
al2o3cr
The most significant overlap between Dialyzer and pattern-matching is that it will detect patterns that can never match. For instance, if you have code like this:
If Dialyzer can prove that
some_functionwill never successfully return{:ok, something}, it will report an error.cjbottaro
Require? No. It might tell you when you have unnecessary cases though.
Coming from a statically typed language, things like typespecs + Dialyzer warnings might make you feel more at home though.
I honestly wish Elixir could have some gradual typing system that stops compilation if typespecs don’t add up.