shjeon0730
Hi!
I am new in Elixir. Still learning syntax. But I I see very weird behavior while I am testing functions.
The question is about Enum.chunk_by function.
list=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
Enum.chunk_by(list, & rem(&1,4)==0)
expected result is,
[[1,2,3],[4],[5,6,7],[8],[9,10]]
but, what I am receiving is
[[1, 2, 3], [4], [5, 6, 7], ~c"\b", ~c"\t\n"]
My elixir version is 1.17.3, on MacOS 15.1.1, M1 Pro
I am curious if there is some system-relative background of this result.
Thank you!
===
Answer for this question:
turned out ~c"\b" is equivalent to [8], and ~c"\t\n" is equivalent to [9,10]
as the chosen answer explains. This looks like a common mistake that a beginner is confused (like me). Thanks for all the answers! I couldn’t understand the short answers, but after I understand what is happening, even the short answers makes sense.
Where Next?
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Phoenix, LiveView, multimedia pipelines, distributed systems. 400 engineers, Elixir since 2017. Available for hire.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #elixirconf-us
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
Producing high quality Elixir screencasts since 2017.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
The
~csigil indicates a charlisthttps://hexdocs.pm/elixir/binaries-strings-and-charlists.html#charlists
shjeon0730
Hey, @al2o3cr , thanks for taking a look.
My question is if the result is expected, if so, why?
As I see the document, it says it should create chunk when callback function returns different value.
the callback function
& rem(&1,4)==0will return like this:[false, false, false, true, false, false, false, true, false, false]
because rem(1,4)==1, rem(2,4)==2, rem(3,4)==3, rem(4,4)==0,…
so, rem(&1,4) will be [1,2,3,0,1,2,3,0,1,2]
But, why ~c"\b" and ~c"\t\n" comes to where [8], [9,10] should be?
arcanemachine
Check out this post and read the rest of its thread as well:
llama
Short answer:
“This is done to ease interoperability with Erlang, even though it may lead to some surprising behavior. For example, if you are storing a list of integers that happen to range between 0 and 127, by default IEx will interpret this as a charlist and it will display the corresponding ASCII characters.”