hawkyre
Is there any way to leverage the pipe operator to access properties of an object after a sequence of operations?
I’m trying to do a sequence of operations followed by accessing a property in the final map but I can’t get it to work while making it look great
Here’s what I have:
hd(hd(ctg).tier_group.tiers_in_tier_group).tier.tier_pills
|> Enum.at(pill_ix)
|> &(&1.pill_id)
ElixirLS autocorrects this to
hd(hd(ctg).tier_group.tiers_in_tier_group).tier.tier_pills
|> Enum.at(pill_ix)
|> (& &1.pill_id)
and that does not work, it throws the following error:
(ArgumentError) cannot pipe Enum.at(
hd(hd(ctg).tier_group.tiers_in_tier_group).tier.tier_pills,
pill_ix
) into & &1.pill_id, can only pipe into local calls foo(), remote calls Foo.bar() or anonymous function calls foo.()
This makes me think it’s not possible, but there’s no harm in asking because it still feels like something with a trivial solution. The alternative would be doing this:
(hd(hd(ctg).tier_group.tiers_in_tier_group).tier.tier_pills
|> Enum.at(pill_ix)).pill_id
but this way makes me have to add an extra parenthesis to the front, which is a bit ugly in my opinion because in the case I have to do it several times it will accumulate a lot of parenthesis in the front, plus I’ll have to go back and forth adding them.
Any insights into this? Thanks!
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex










First 5 of 5 Posts
Nicd
If you wanted to do it like this, you would need to write
but in the latest Elixir you can also use
which you may prefer. Or you might use
foo = <your_pipe>and thenfoo.pill_id.moogle19
Why not use
Map.fetch!/2?al2o3cr
The leading parenthesis is the only thing you have a problem with in that expression?
The short answer for your question is
then, as noted by others. But I’d recommend you consider identifying and naming these complex operations better. For instance:could be:
and then your pipe is shorter / gone:
hawkyre
ohhh alright, thanks a lot! I’ll probably go with the then notation since it looks the cleanest in this scenario
hawkyre
That’s another way, thanks!
Yeah it most definitely needs some refactoring but I was just trying to get something to work since I more often than not have to end up changing what I wrote hahaha