James_E

James_E

I’ve got this bit of code; I’m wondering why create_or_open_room always creates a new room, even when there is an existing child process with the same ID:

If a child specification with the specified ID already exists, child_spec is discarded and this function returns an error with :already_started or :already_present if the corresponding child process is running or not, respectively.
Supervisor.start_child/2 — Elixir v1.17.3

defmodule FooApp.Application do
  # See https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/Application.html
  # for more information on OTP Applications
  @moduledoc false

  use Application

  require Logger

  def create_or_open_room(<<room_name::binary>>) do # FIXME this is supposed to be idempotent
    case DynamicSupervisor.start_child(
      FooApp.RoomSupervisor,
      %{id: room_name, start: {GenServer, :start_link, [FooApp.Application.Model, room_name]}}
    ) do
      {:ok, pid} -> Logger.debug("=====STARTED #{inspect pid}====="); pid
      :ignore -> raise "unreachable"
      {:error, {:already_started, pid}} -> Logger.debug("=====IDEMPOTENCE OK #{inspect pid}====="); pid
      {:error, error} -> raise inspect error
    end
  end

  @impl true
  def start(_type, _args) do
    children = [
      FooAppWeb.Telemetry,
      FooApp.Repo,
      {Ecto.Migrator,
        repos: Application.fetch_env!(:fooApp, :ecto_repos),
        skip: skip_migrations?()},
      # {DNSCluster, query: Application.get_env(:fooApp, :dns_cluster_query) || :ignore},
      # {Phoenix.PubSub, name: FooApp.PubSub}, # for general app communication
      {Phoenix.PubSub, name: FooApp.RoomPubSub}, # ONLY for room statechange announcements, to avoid collision between UGC room names and an actual system topic
      # Start the Finch HTTP client for sending emails
      # {Finch, name: FooApp.Finch},
      # Start a worker by calling: FooApp.Worker.start_link(arg)
      # {FooApp.Worker, arg},
      {DynamicSupervisor, name: FooApp.RoomSupervisor},
      # Start to serve requests, typically the last entry
      FooAppWeb.Endpoint
    ]

    # See https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/Supervisor.html
    # for other strategies and supported options
    opts = [strategy: :one_for_one, name: FooApp.Supervisor]
    Supervisor.start_link(children, opts)
  end

  # Tell Phoenix to update the endpoint configuration
  # whenever the application is updated.
  @impl true
  def config_change(changed, _new, removed) do
    FooAppWeb.Endpoint.config_change(changed, removed)
    :ok
  end

  defp skip_migrations?() do
    # By default, sqlite migrations are run when using a release
    System.get_env("RELEASE_NAME") != nil
  end
end
FooApp.Application.Model (a boring GenServer, not relevant, including for completeness)
defmodule FooApp.Application.Model do
  use GenServer

  require Logger

  defmodule State do
    @enforce_keys [:name, :resources]
    defstruct [:name, :resources, :_pubsub_topic]
  end

  defmodule Resource do
    @enforce_keys [:name]
    defstruct [:name, status: "undefined"]

    @allowable_statuses ["green", "green-with-exception", "red"]
    def status_ok(status) do
      status in @allowable_statuses
    end
  end

  defp list_update_such(list, fun_pred, fun) do
    # TODO consider overhauling/replacing this with a new data structure entirely
    # https://forum.elixirforum.com/t/need-to-display-resources-in-the-exact-order-they-are-declared-ordered-map/67829/4?u=james_e
    Enum.map(list, &if fun_pred.(&1) do fun.(&1) else &1 end)
  end

  @impl true
  def init(name) do
    resource_names = [ # FIXME actually load this from ecto
      "FROG-0",
      "FROG-1",
      "FROG-2",
      "FROG-3",
      "FROG-4",
      "FROG-5",
      "FROG-6",
      "FROG-7",
    ];
    {:ok, %State{
      name: name,
      resources: resource_names |> Enum.map(&%Resource{name: &1}),
      _pubsub_topic: name
    }}
  end

  @impl true
  def handle_continue(:broadcast_statechange, state) do
    # TODO this seems located inappropriately far from the call to subscribe; is there a better pattern for this?
    Phoenix.PubSub.broadcast!(FooApp.RoomPubSub, state._pubsub_topic, {:statechange, state});
    {:noreply, state}
  end

  @impl true
  def handle_call(:get_state, _from, state) do
    {:reply, state, state}
  end

  @impl true
  def handle_call({:act, actor, action}, from, state) do
    case action do
      {:set_resource_status, resource_name, new_status} -> (
        with \
          true <- actor === "director" || {:error, "Unauthorized"},
          resources = state.resources,
          true <- Resource.status_ok(new_status) || {:error, "Invalid status"}
        do
          {:reply, :ok, %{state |
            resources: list_update_such(resources, &(&1.name === resource_name), &%{&1 | status: new_status})
          }, {:continue, :broadcast_statechange}}
        else
          {:error, error} -> {:reply, {:error, error}, state}
        end
      )

      _ -> (
        Logger.warning("Client #{inspect from} attempted invalid action");
        {:reply, {:error, "Action incongruent with current state"}, state}
      )
    end
  end
end

Showing Posts 9 to 1

James_E

James_E OP

This function — just like DynamicSupervisor.start_child/2 — requires you to pass in an existing, running DynamicSupervisor. Starting that process is handled elsewhere.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Glad you made it work for you but I still don’t understand how can you not ensure the DynamicSupervisor gets started at the, ahem, start of your application.

James_E

James_E OP

Can’t edit the post because it’s too old; here’s an implementation for posterity with proper documentation

@doc """
Exactly like [DynamicSupervisor.start_child/2](https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.17/DynamicSupervisor.html#start_child/2)
except that the "id" field is not [disregarded](https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.17/Supervisor.html#module-child-specification).

Only works with simple GenServer supervisees for now.

## Usage

    start_child_idempotent(
      Foo.Application.DynamicSupervisorForModelInstances, %{
      id: locally_unique_id_for_this_model_instance, start: {GenServer, :start_link, [
      Foo.Application.Model,
      model_arg
    ]}})
"""
@spec start_child_idempotent(Supervisor.supervisor(), Supervisor.child_spec()) :: DynamicSupervisor.on_start_child()
def start_child_idempotent(dynamic_supervisor, child_spec = %{id: id, start: _}) do
  # https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.17/GenServer.html#module-name-registration
  # FIXME: https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.17/Registry.html#module-using-in-via
  reg_name = {:global, {
    "#{__MODULE__}.start_child_idempotent",
    GenServer.whereis(dynamic_supervisor) || dynamic_supervisor,
    id
  }}

  # https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.15/DynamicSupervisor.html#start_child/2:~:text=while%20the%20:id%20field%20is%20still%20required,the%20value%20is%20ignored
  child_spec = Map.update!(child_spec, :start, fn
    {m = GenServer, f = :start_link, [m1, x]} -> {m, f, [m1, x, [name: reg_name]]}
    {m = GenServer, f = :start_link, [m1, x, opts]} -> {m, f, [m1, x, opts ++ [name: reg_name]]}
    {m, f = :start_link, [x, opts]} when is_list(opts) -> {m, f, [x, opts ++ [name: reg_name]]}
    start -> raise %ArgumentError{message: "only GenServer style start_link children supported at this time.\n#{inspect start}"}
  end)

  # https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/blob/v1.12.2/lib/elixir/lib/gen_server.ex#L929
  # https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/OTP-24.2.1/lib/stdlib/src/gen.erl#L83
  case DynamicSupervisor.start_child(dynamic_supervisor, child_spec) do
    {:ok, pid} -> {:ok, pid}
    {:error, {:already_started, pid}} -> {:ok, pid}
    other -> other
  end
end
James_E

James_E OP

I was referring the @spec — where the DynamicSupervisor’s child’s id field is required, yet ignored — that was a red herring that confused me when trying to implement this.

The ID here isn’t meant to be a global name, only a local ID within the scope of that specific DynamicSupervisor.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Come on now, spec is not “wack”, you just need a name if you want to, you know, have a named process. :smiley:

James_E

James_E OP

I see… I adapted the code with that in mind, and now it seems to work perfectly:

  defp start_child_idempotent(supervisor, id, module, init_arg, opt \\ []) do
    # https://forum.elixirforum.com/t/dynamicsupervisor-how-to-start-child-iff-it-doesnt-exist/67858/5?u=james_e
    reg_name = {:global, {"#{__MODULE__}.start_child_idempotent", GenServer.whereis(supervisor), id}} # FIXME: maybe convert to https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.17/Registry.html#module-using-in-via at some point
    case DynamicSupervisor.start_child(
      supervisor, %{
      id: nil, # https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.16/DynamicSupervisor.html#start_child/2:~:text=while%20the%20:id%20field%20is%20still%20required,the%20value%20is%20ignored
      start: {GenServer, :start_link, [module, init_arg, opt ++ [name: reg_name]]}
    }) do
      {:ok, pid} -> {:ok, pid}
      {:error, {:already_started, pid}} -> {:ok, pid}
      on_start_child -> on_start_child
    end

  def create_or_open_room(<<room_name::binary>>) do
    start_child_idempotent(
      FooApp.RoomSupervisor, room_name,
      FooApp.Application.Model, room_name
    )
  end

Thanks all for the tips. I don’t know how I missed that notice about the spec being wack.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

As @al2o3cr said, the :id is ignored. Though if my memory serves you can achieve what you like by supplying a :name… which is what @D4no0 said.

If none of that works you could just use DynamicSupervisor.which_children and try to look for the already-started child there before attempting to start a new one.

D4no0

D4no0

Yeah, I think this applies only to named genservers, AKA starting them with option name: ProcessName.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

The docs for DynamicSupervisor.start_child mention that the id is required but ignored:

Note that while the :id field is still required in the spec, the value is ignored and therefore does not need to be unique.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews